Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Use in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Use in Patients With Head/Neck Cancer
This document is in response to your request for information regarding Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy [SG]) and its use in patients with head and neck cancer. Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved Prescribing Information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
Trodelvy is not indicated for use in patients with head and neck cancer. The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Summary
Clinical Studies in Patients With R/R Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)
TROPiCS-03 is a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in adult patients with metastatic solid tumors, including patients with R/R advanced HNSCC, who progressed after prior PLT-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy. Results from the R/R HNSCC cohort (n=43) showed1:
- The ORR (95% CI) was 16% (7–31), median (95% CI) PFS was 4.1 months (2.6–5.8), median (95% CI) OS was 9 (7.1–10.5) months, and CBR (95% CI) was 28% (15–44).
- Median (95% CI) DOR was 4.2 months (2.6–NR), and DOR rate (95% CI) at 6 months was 43% (10–73).
- The most common any grade TEAEs (>35%) were diarrhea (47%), nausea (47%), neutropenia (47%), fatigue (44%), and alopecia (37%). The most common Grade 3 TEAEs (>8%) were neutropenia (23%), anemia (9%), and leukopenia (9%). The only Grade 4 TEAE observed was neutropenia (9%).
- TEAEs led to treatment interruptions in 47% of patients, discontinuations in 5% of patients, and dose reduction in 21% of patients.
IMMU-132-01, a phase 1/2, single-arm basket study investigated the efficacy and safety of SG in patients with metastatic epithelial cancers, including 4 patients with HNSCC, who had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior therapy for metastatic disease.2
- No patient had a CR or PR (ORR=0%), and SD was observed in 3 (75%) patients in the HNSCC cohort. CBR, DOR, OS, and PFS were not provided due to small size.
- To date, safety data specific to patients with HNSCC have not been published.
Clinical Studies in Patients With R/R HNSCC
TROPiCS-03 Study in Metastatic Solid Tumors
Study design and demographics1
TROPiCS-03 is a multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 basket study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors, including patients with R/R advanced HNSCC, who progressed after prior PLT-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy (given sequentially in either order or in combination). Patients received SG 10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle, which was continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, study withdrawal, or death.
The primary endpoint was investigator’s assessment ORR (confirmed CR + PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary endpoints included OS, safety, and investigator-assessed DOR, CBR (confirmed CR + PR + SD ≥6 months), and PFS.
Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study and the median (range) duration of exposure to SG was 2.5 (0.3–12.3) months. Patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–17) cycles of SG. At the time of data cutoff, 2 patients remained on treatment and 31 patients (72%) had discontinued treatment due to progression (radiologic progression [n=26]; clinical progression [n=5]). Demographics and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. TROPiCS-03 (HNSCC Cohort): Demographics and Characteristics1
HNSCC Cohort (N=43) | ||
Age, median (range), years | 62 (46–75) | |
≥65 years, n (%) | 11 (26) | |
Male, n (%) | 33 (77) | |
Race, n (%) | White | 33 (77) |
Asian | 4 (9) | |
Other/not reported | 4 (9)/2 (5) | |
Current or former smoker, n (%) | 32 (74) | |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, n (%) | 9 (21)/34 (79) | |
HPV Status,a n (%) | Positive | 18 (42) |
Negative | 22 (51) | |
Primary site of disease,b n (%) | Oropharynx | 19 (44) |
Larynx | 11 (26) | |
Oral cavity | 8 (19) | |
Nasal cavity | 2 (5) | |
Nasopharynx | 1 (2) | |
Current disease stage, n (%) | Metastatic | 37 (86) |
Locally Advanced | 6 (14) | |
Number of prior anticancer regimens, n (%) | 2 | 16 (37) |
3 | 18 (42) | |
>3 | 9 (21) | |
Prior anticancer regimens, median (range), n | 3 (2–9) | |
Number of prior regimens in advanced/metastatic setting, n (%) | 1 | 14 (33) |
2 | 15 (35) | |
>2 | 14 (33) | |
Prior anticancer therapy type,c n (%) | Chemotherapy | 43 (100) |
Immunotherapy | 43 (100) | |
Targeted therapy | 22 (51) | |
Best response to last prior anticancer therapy,d n (%) | Responsive (CR/PR) | 4 (9) |
Nonresponsive (SD/PD) | 37 (86) | |
aUnknown (n=3; 7%).
bUnknown (n=2; 5%).
cOther (n=1; 2%).
dUnknown (n=2; 5%).
Efficacy
Efficacy results by investigator assessment are shown in Table 2. Twenty-two patients (51%) had a reduction in tumor size, with 16% (n=7) having a reduction of >30%. The median (95% CI) PFS was 4.1 (2.6–5.8) months and the PFS (95% CI) rates at 6 and 12 months were 32% (17–47) and 12% (3–28), respectively. The median (95% CI) OS was 9 (7.1–10.5) months and the OS (95% CI) rates at 6 and 12 months were 75% (59–86) and 28% (13–45), respectively. The median (range) duration of OS follow-up was 7.8 (0.6–19.8) months.1 Efficacy outcomes by HPV status and oropharynx vs non-oropharynx subsites are shown in Table 3.3
Table 2. TROPiCS-03 (HNSCC Cohort): Efficacy by Investigator Assessment1
Efficacy per RECIST version 1.1 | N=43 | |
ORR (confirmed CR + PR), % (95% CI) | 16 (7–31) | |
Best overall response, n (%) | Confirmed PR | 7 (16) |
SD | 21 (49) | |
PD | 9 (21) | |
Not evaluablea | 2 (5) | |
Not assessedb | 4 (9) | |
CBR (confirmed CR + PR + SD ≥6 months), % (95% CI) | 28 (15–44) | |
Time to response,c median (95% CI), months | 1.4 (1.3–3) | |
DOR,c,d median (95% CI), months | 4.2 (2.6–NR) | |
DOR rate at 6 months,d % (95% CI) | 43 (10–73) | |
a1 patient had a partial measurement of target lesions postbaseline, and 1 patient had a noncontrast scan due to a
low glomerular filtration rate.
bPatients without any postbaseline tumor assessment.
cPatients with confirmed CR or PR.
dCalculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Table 3. TROPiCS-03 (HNSCC Cohort): Efficacy Outcomes by HPV Status and Subsites3
Efficacy | HPV Positive (n=18) | HPV negativea | Oropharynx carcinoma | Non-Oropharynx carcinoma | |
ORR (confirmed CR + PR), % (95% CI) | 17 (4–41) | 16 (5–36) | 26 (9–51) | 8 (1–27) | |
Best overall response, n (%) | Confirmed PR | 3 (17) | 4 (16) | 5 (26) | 2 (8) |
SD | 10 (56) | 11 (44) | 10 (53) | 11 (46) | |
PD | 3 (17) | 6 (24) | 4 (21) | 5 (21) | |
Not evaluableb | 1 (6) | 1 (4) | 0 | 2 (8) | |
Not assessedc | 1 (6) | 3 (12) | 0 | 4 (17) | |
CBR (confirmed CR + PR + SD ≥6 months), % (95% CI) | 28 (10–54) | 28 (12–49) | 37 (16–62) | 21 (7–42) | |
PFS, median (95% CI), months | 4.4 | 2.7 | 4.6 (2.6–6.7) | 2.8 (1.4–7.8) | |
PFS rate at 6 months, % (95% CI), | 20 (5–42) | 44 (24–63) | 30 (11–52) | 35 (15–56) | |
PFS rate at 12 months, % (95% CI), | 13 (2–35) | NR | NR | 13 (1–40) | |
OS, median (95% CI), months | 9 | 8.9 | 8.9 | 9.9 | |
a3 patients had unknown HPV status.
bPatients with non-evaluable response.
cPatients without any post-baseline tumor assessment.
Safety1
A summary of TEAEs is presented in Table 4 and the most common TEAEs reported are detailed in Table 5.
Table 4. TROPiCS-03 (HNSCC Cohort): Safety Summary1
TEAEs, n (%) | N=43 |
Any-grade TEAEs | 43 (100) |
Treatment-related | 43 (100) |
Grade ≥3 TEAEs | 25 (58) |
Treatment-related | 19 (44) |
Serious TEAEs | 13 (30) |
Treatment-related | 5 (12) |
TEAEs that led to interruption of SG | 20 (47) |
TEAEs that led to dose reduction of SGa | 9 (21) |
TEAEs that led to discontinuation of SGb | 2 (5) |
Treatment-related | 1 (2)c |
TEAEs that led to deathd | 3 (7) |
Treatment-related | 1 (2) |
a4 patients with neutropenia; 2 patients with nausea; others unspecified.
b1 patient with respiratory failure underwent interruption of SG, but the patient died before SG could be resumed; event was recorded as discontinuation due to a TEAE.
c1 patient discontinued SG due to treatment-related fatigue.
dSepsis (n=1), septic shock (n=1), and unknown cause (n=1). The 1 case of septic shock that led to death was deemed related to study treatment.
Table 5. TROPiCS-03 (HNSCC Cohort): Most Common TEAEs (N=43)1
Any Gradea | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | |
Diarrhea | 20 (47) | 1 (2) | 0 |
Nausea | 20 (47) | 3 (7) | 0 |
Neutropenia | 20 (47) | 10 (23) | 4 (9) |
Fatigue | 19 (44) | 1 (2) | 0 |
Alopecia | 16 (37) | 0 | 0 |
Vomiting | 14 (33) | 1 (2) | 0 |
Anemia | 13 (30) | 4 (9) | 0 |
Dyspnea | 11 (26) | 3 (7) | 0 |
Decreased appetite | 10 (23) | 1 (2) | 0 |
Leukopenia | 8 (19) | 4 (9) | 0 |
Hyponatremia | 7 (16) | 1 (2) | 0 |
aTEAE reported in ≥15% of patients are presented.
IMMU-132-01 Study in Metastatic Epithelial Cancer2
Study design and demographics
IMMU-132-01, a phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label basket study, investigated the efficacy and safety of SG in patients with metastatic epithelial cancers, including 4 patients with HNSCC, who had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior therapy for metastatic disease. In the HNSCC cohort, SG 8 or 10 mg/kg IV was administered on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent. Efficacy endpoints in the overall basket study included ORR (confirmed PR + CR by investigator assessment per RECIST version 1.1), DOR, CBR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 months), PFS, and OS.
Efficacy
No patient had a CR or PR (ORR=0%), and SD was observed in 3 (75%) patients in the HNSCC cohort. CBR, DOR, OS, and PFS were not provided due to small size.
Safety
To date, safety data specific to patients with HNSCC have not been published. In the overall safety population (N=495), the most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (62.6%), neutropenia (57.8%), diarrhea (56.2%), fatigue (48.3%), and alopecia (40.4%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 42.4% and 5.3% of patients, respectively. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 41 (8.3%) patients.
Ongoing Clinical Studies
A phase 2, single-center, open-label, single-arm study (NCT05884320) is investigating the use of SG in adult patients with histology-proven recurrent and/or metastatic secretory gland cancers.
SETHY is a phase 2, prospective, multicohort, single-arm, non-randomized, non-blinded study (NCT06235216) investigating the use of SG in adult patients with advanced or metastatic radioactive-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.
References
- Michel L, Jimeno A, Sukari A, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase 2 TROPiCS-03 basket study. Clin Cancer Res. 2025;3(31):832-838.
- Bardia A, Messersmith WA, Kio EA, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan, a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with epithelial cancer: final safety and efficacy results from the phase I/II IMMU-132-01 basket trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(6):746-756.
- Michel L, Jimeno A, Sukari A, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase 2 TROPiCS-03 basket study [supplemntary material]. Clin Cancer Res. 2025;3(31):832-838.
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 7
BICR=blinded independent central review
CBR=clinical benefit rate
CR=complete response
DOR=duration of response
HPV= human papillomavirus
HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
NR=not reached
ORR=objective response rate
OS=overall survival
PD-(L)1=programmed death (ligand)-1
PFS=progression-free survival
PLT=platinum
PR=partial response
RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
R/R=relapsed/refractory
SD=stable disease
SG=sacituzumab govitecan-hziy
TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 7