Biktarvy® (BIC/FTC/TAF)
Coadministration with Rifamycins
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Biktarvy® (BIC/FTC/TAF)
Coadministration With Rifamycins
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/biktarvy/biktarvy_pi.
Summary
Product Labeling1
BIC is a substrate of CYP3A and UGT1A1. A drug that is a strong inducer of CYP3A and also an inducer of UGT1A1 can substantially decrease the plasma concentrations of BIC which may lead to loss of therapeutic effect of BIC/FTC/TAF and development of resistance. TAF is a substrate of P-gp. Coadministration of drugs that inhibit P-gp activity may increase the absorption and plasma concentrations of TAF. Coadministration of drugs that induce P‑gp activity are expected to decrease the absorption of TAF, resulting in decreased plasma concentration of TAF, which may lead to loss of therapeutic effect of BIC/FTC/TAF and development of resistance.
Coadministration of RIF, a strong inducer of CYP3A and P-gp and inducer of UGT1A1, with BIC/FTC/TAF is contraindicated due to decreased BIC plasma concentrations, which may result in the loss of therapeutic effect and development of resistance to BIC/FTC/TAF. Coadministration of BIC/FTC/TAF with RFB or RPT is expected to decrease BIC and TAF concentrations.
Clinical Studies of BIC/FTC/TAF With Rifamycins
In a phase 2b, open-label, randomized controlled study, adults with HIV and TB who received BIC/FTC/TAF twice daily concomitantly with a RIF-based treatment regimen for TB had a high rate (94%) of virologic suppression at Week 24. No SAEs were considered related to study drug.2
In a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in adults with HIV on RPT‑based treatment regimens for LTBI, ≥96.5% of participants in the BIC/FTC/TAF groups maintained HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL within 12 months of LTBI treatment. Most AEs were Grade 1 or 2.3
In three phase 1, open-label studies, decreases in BIC exposure were observed when BIC was coadministered with RIF or RFB; coadministration of BIC/FTC/TAF with RPT once weekly had less impact on the PK of BIC than coadministration with RIF or RFB.4
In a phase 1, open-label study, BIC/FTC/TAF twice daily in combination with daily RIF resulted in 60%, 14%, and 20% reductions in BIC, TAF, and TFV AUC0-24h, respectively, compared with BIC/FTC/TAF daily.5,6
In a phase 1, open-label study, coadministration of RIF with FTC/TAF decreased intracellular TFV-DP concentrations by 36% compared with FTC/TAF alone.7
Clinical Studies of BIC/FTC/TAF Use With Rifamycins
CAPRISA 093 INSIGHT: BIC/FTC/TAF Twice Daily With RIF
Study design2
A phase 2b, open-label, non-comparative, randomized controlled study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and PK of BIC/FTC/TAF 50/200/25 mg twice daily in adults (n=80) with HIV and TB who received a RIF-based treatment regimen for TB. In the non-comparative control arm, participants received treatment with DTG/3TC/TDF once daily + DTG 50 mg at night (n=42). Participants in both arms received concomitant RIF‑based TB treatment for 24 weeks, remained on their respective ARV regimen for an additional 2 weeks after TB treatment was stopped, then continued the once-daily dosing of their ARV regimen (BIC/FTC/TAF or DTG/3TC/TDF) until Week 48.
Results2
Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) at Week 24 (primary endpoint) was similar between the BIC/FTC/TAF (94%; 95% CI: 86–98%) and DTG/3TC/TDF (95%; 95% CI: 84–99%) arms. At Week 48, rates of virologic suppression were 95% (95% CI: 88–99%) in the BIC/FTC/TAF arm and 93% (95% CI: 81–99%) in the DTG/3TC/TDF arm. No treatment failures (HIV-1 RNA >400 c/mL) at Week 24 or Week 48 were reported.
There were no treatment discontinuations or drug switches due to AEs. SAEs were reported in 11 participants (14%) in the BIC/FTC/TAF arm and 3 (7%) in the DTG/3TC/TDF arm; no SAEs were deemed related to study drug. Grade 3 and 4 AEs were reported in 33 participants (41%) and 7 (9%), respectively, in the BIC/FTC/TAF arm and in 21 participants (50%) and 6 (14%) in the DTG/3TC/TDF arm. One death due to massive hemoptysis was reported in the DTG/3TC/TDF arm.
BIC Cτ levels were lower with twice-daily BIC/FTC/TAF administration during TB treatment than once-daily BIC/FTC/TAF administration after TB treatment completed (0.397 mg/L [71%] vs 1.88 mg/L [57%], respectively; GMR, 0.217; 90% CI: 0.179–0.263). Most Cτ levels remained above the inhibitory quotient of 0.162 mg/L, with none of the observed doses and 11.8% of unobserved twice-daily BIC/FTC/TAF plus TB treatment and 3.8% of unobserved once-daily BIC/FTC/TAF doses falling below the inhibitory quotient.
PK substudy8
A nested PK substudy was conducted in adults who received BIC/FTC/TAF (N=43) with and without RIF. Plasma and DBS were collected pre-dose and through 12 hours post-dose at Weeks 4 and 12 (during RIF‑based TB treatment) and through 24 to 25 hours post-dose at Week 32 (after TB treatment had been completed).
During the BIC/FTC/TAF twice-daily + RIF dosing period, exposure values for plasma TFV and TFV-DP exposures were higher than when BIC/FTC/TAF was administered once daily
(Table 1).
Table 1. CAPRISA 093 INSIGHT PK Substudy:
Plasma TFV and Intracellular TFV-DP PK Parameters8
PK Parameters | Geometric Mean (CV%) | GMR (90% CI) | ||||
BIC/FTC/TAF Twice Daily + RIF Week 4 | BIC/FTC/TAF Twice Daily + RIF Week 12 | BIC/FTC/TAF Once Daily Week 32 | Week 4 vs | Week 12 vs Week 32 | ||
TFV | AUC0–24h | 370 (59)a | 356 (66)a | 305 (47)b | 1.28 (1.1–1.5) | 1.24 (1.06–1.45) |
Cmax (ng/mL) | 23 (55)a | 22 (60)a | 19 (40)b | 1.21 (1.05–1.4) | 1.23 (1.07–1.41) | |
TFV-DP | AUC0–24h | 5116 (84)a | 5889 (73)c | 4685 (61)c | 1.08 (0.93–1.26) | 1.32 (1.13–1.53) |
Cmax (fmol/punch) | 300 (80)a | 341 (69)c | 222 (56)c | 1.37 (1.19–1.57) | 1.63 (1.42–1.87) | |
an=40. bn=39. cn=41
Note: AUC0–24h for BIC/FTC/TAF twice daily + RIF was calculated by multiplying the extrapolated AUC0–12h by 2.
BIC/FTC/TAF With RPT-Based Regimens for LTBI3
A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 479 PWH who were given 3 months of weekly RPT plus isoniazid (3HP) or 1 month of daily RPT plus isoniazid (1HP) in combination with ART. The primary outcome was the virologic response (HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL) rate in the ITT and PP populations. A total of 142 patients received 1HP and BIC/FTC/TAF (1HP/BIC group) and 38 received 3HP and BIC/FTC/TAF (3HP/BIC group). Overall, 97.9% of patients achieved HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL before LTBI treatment.
In the ITT analysis, 96.5% of patients (137/142) in the 1HP/BIC group and 100% (38/38) in the 3HP/BIC group maintained HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL within 12 months after completing LTBI treatment. Completion rates were 95.8% and 97.4% in the 1HP/BIC and 3HP/BIC groups, respectively. In the PP analysis, 131/131 patients in the 1HP/BIC group and 37/37 in the 3HP/BIC group maintained HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL within 12 months after LTBI treatment completion.
Most AEs were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 AEs were reported in 16 patients (7.8%) and 7 (2.6%) in the 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively. One Grade 4 hepatotoxicity event related to acute HCV was reported in the 1HP group. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 13/205 patients (6.3%) and 21/274 (7.7%) in the 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively.
PK of BIC or BIC/FTC/TAF With RIF, RFB, or RPT4
Study design
Three phase 1, open-label, multiple-dose studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to determine how RIF, RFB, and RPT affect the PK, safety, and tolerability of BIC/FTC/TAF. In Study 1/Cohort 2, participants received BIC 75 mg on Days 1 and 15, with a washout period from Days 2 to 4, then received RIF 600 mg once daily on Days 5 through 18; PK sampling was performed on Days 1 and 15. In Study 1/Cohort 5, BIC 75 mg was administered once daily for 6 days, followed by BIC coadministration with RFB 300 mg once daily on Days 7 through 20, with PK sampling on Days 6 and 20. In Study 2/Cohort 2, BIC/FTC/TAF was coadministered twice daily with RIF 600 mg once daily on Days 1 through 28, followed by RIF 600 mg administered once daily alone on Days 29 through 35, with PK sampling on Days 1 and 28. In Study 3, BIC/FTC/TAF was given once daily on Days 1 through 8 and Days 15 through 30, with a washout period on Days 9 through 14; RPT was dosed once weekly starting on Day 15 and 22, in the evening of Day 29, followed by BIC/FTC/TAF 12 hours later on Day 30.
Results
Decreases in BIC exposure were observed when BIC was coadministered with RIF or RFB; coadministration of BIC/FTC/TAF with RPT once weekly had less impact on the PK of BIC than coadministration with RIF or RFB (Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of BIC Plasma PK Parameters Between Studies and Coadministration With RIF, RFB, or RPT (Arora et al)4
Study and PK Parameters | Test GLSM | Reference GLSM of BIC Alone | % GLSM Ratio | |
Study 1/Cohort 2 | AUClast, h mcg/mL | 35.3 | 141.3 | 25 (22.7–27.6) |
AUCinf, h mcg/mL | 35.7 | 145.8 | 24.5 (22–27.3) | |
Cmax, mcg/mL | 5.07 | 7.02 | 72.2 (67.1–77.8) | |
Study 1/Cohort 5 | AUCτ, h mcg/mL | 61 | 98.4 | 62 (53.1–72.5) |
Cmax, mcg/mL | 5.72 | 7.12 | 80.4 (66.9–96.5) | |
Cτ, mcg/mL | 1.09 | 2.48 | 44 (37.1–52.1) | |
Study 2/Cohort 2 | AUC0–24, h mcg/mL | 44.5 | 112.6 | 39.5 (35.7–43.7) |
Cmax, mcg/mL | 4.48 | 8.43 | 53.2 (49.1–57.6) | |
Cτ, mcg/mL | 0.58 | 2.95 | 19.7 (17.2–22.7) | |
Study 3 | AUCτ, h mcg/mL | 80.3 | 93.9 | 85.5 (81.3–89.8) |
Cmax, mcg/mL | 6.79 | 6.78 | 100.1 (95.5–104.9) | |
Cτ, mcg/mL | 1.47 | 2.44 | 60.4 (56.3–64.7) | |
Study 3 | AUCτ, h mcg/mL | 69.6 | 93.9 | 74.1 (70.2–78.3) |
Cmax, mcg/mL | 6.5 | 6.78 | 95.9 (91.8–100.1) | |
Cτ, mcg/mL | 1.04 | 2.44 | 42.5 (39.1–46.2) | |
Abbreviations: AUCτ=area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval; AUCinf=area under the concentration-time curve from Time 0 to infinity; AUClast=area under the concentration-time curve up to the last measurable concentration.
an=15. bn=13. cn=26. dn=29. en=28.
No SAEs related to the coadministration of BIC or BIC/FTC/TAF with RIF, RFB, or RPT were reported. One participant in Study 2 reported SAEs following a physical assault that were not related to study drug.
PK of BIC and TAF Twice Daily in Combination With RIF5,6
Study design
A phase 1, open-label, parallel-design, single-center study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and PK of BIC/FTC/TAF 50/200/25 mg once daily (Cohort 1; n=26) vs BIC/FTC/TAF 50/200/25 mg twice daily plus RIF 600 mg once daily (Cohort 2; n=26) in healthy volunteers.
Results
Daily BIC exposure measured by AUC0–24h was expected to be 60% lower in Cohort 2 than in Cohort 1 (Table 3). Mean BIC Cτ was reduced by 80% in Cohort 2 vs Cohort 1. After this ~80% reduction is accounted for, individuals who receive BIC/FTC/TAF twice daily in combination with RIF once daily may fall below the paEC95 of BIC (162 ng/mL). In Cohort 2, AUC0–24h was expected to be reduced by <15% for TAF, ~20% for TFV, and ~24% for intracellular PBMC-associated TFV-DP vs Cohort 1.The study authors concluded that BIC/FTC/TAF STR should not be used in combination with RIF.
Table 3. PK of BIC, TAF, and TFV (Custodio et al)5,6
Parameter | Cohort 1: BIC/FTC/TAF | Cohort 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Twice Daily + | %GLSM Ratio (90% CI) | |
BIC, mean (CV) | AUC0–24h, ng·h/mL | 115,000 (21) | 45,600 (23) | 39.5 (35.7–43.7) |
Cmax, ng/mL | 8530 (16) | 4560 (19) | 53.2 (49.1–57.6) | |
Cτ, ng/mL | 3070 (28) | 608 (30) | 19.7 (17.2–22.7) | |
TAF, mean (CV) | AUC0–24h, ng·h/mL | 345 (52) | 290 (48) | 85.8 (69.7–106) |
TFV, mean (CV) | AUC0–24h, ng·h/mL | 348 (20) | 277 (19) | 79.9 (73.1–87.3) |
TFV-DP | AUC0–24h, fmol·h/106 cells | – | – | 76.3 (58.7–99.2) |
All healthy volunteers completed the study. Treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 31% in Cohort 1 and 39% in Cohort 2. All AEs were mild or moderate and resolved during the study. No Grade 3 or 4 AEs and no laboratory abnormalities were observed.
PK of FTC/TAF Administered in Combination With RIF7
Study design
A phase 1, open-label, single‑center study was conducted in 23 HIV-negative, healthy volunteers to assess the PK, safety, and tolerability of FTC/TAF, FTC/TAF + RIF, and TDF. Healthy volunteers received FTC/TAF 200/25 mg once daily for 28 days, given with a standard meal containing 20 g of fat content. For the next 28 days (Days 29–56), participants received RIF 600 mg daily, given 30 minutes before a standard meal, followed by FTC/TAF 200/25 mg. On Day 57, participants discontinued FTC/TAF + RIF and began receiving TDF 300 mg monotherapy daily, given with a standard meal on Days 57 to 84.
Results
Compared with FTC/TAF, FTC/TAF + RIF decreased the plasma TAF Cmax by 50% and the TAF AUC0–24h by 55%; intracellular TFV-DP Cmax decreased by 38%, and AUC0–24h decreased by 36%. However, intracellular TFV-DP concentrations were 4‑fold higher with FTC/TAF + RIF than with TDF monotherapy (Table 4). RIF coadministration did not alter plasma FTC or intracellular FTC‑triphosphate concentrations.
Table 4. Summary of PK Parameters (Cerrone et al)7
Parameter, GMR (90% CI) | FTC/TAF + RIF vs FTC/TAF | FTC/TAF + RIF vs TDF Monotherapy |
TAF Cmax | 0.5 (0.42–0.61) | – |
TAF AUC0–24h | 0.45 (0.33–0.6) | – |
TFV-DP Cmax | 0.62 (0.52–0.74) | 4.4 (3.09–6.27) |
TFV-DP AUC0–24h | 0.64 (0.54–0.75) | 4.21 (2.98–5.95) |
FTC/TAF, FTC/TAF + RIF, and TDF monotherapy were well tolerated. Two AEs (both Grade 3) were reported, and no Grade 4 AEs were observed. There were 2 discontinuations: 1 case of transient ALT increase, deemed unlikely to be TAF-related by the study investigators, and 1 case of Grade 2 gastrointestinal symptoms, deemed RIF‑related by the study investigators.
References
1. Enclosed, Gilead Sciences Inc. BIKTARVY® (bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir
alafenamide) tablets, for oral use. U.S. Prescribing Information. Foster City, CA.
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 7
3TC=lamivudine
AE=adverse event
ARV=antiretroviral
ART=antiretroviral therapy
AUC0–12/24h=area under the concentration-time curve from Time 0 to 12/24 hours
BIC=bictegravir
c/mL=copies/mL
CAPRISA=Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa
CD4=cluster of differentiation 4
Cτ=trough concentration
Cmax=maximum concentration
CV=coefficient of variation
DBS=dried blood spots
DTG=dolutegravir
FTC=emtricitabine
GLSM=geometric least squares mean
GMR=geometric mean ratio
LTBI=latent tuberculosis infection
paEC95=protein-adjusted 95% effective concentration
PBMC=peripheral blood mononuclear cells
P-gp=permeability glycoprotein
PK=pharmacokinetic(s)
PP=per protocol
RFB=rifabutin
RIF=rifampin or rifampicin
RPT=rifapentine
SAE=serious adverse event
STR=single-tablet regimen
TAF=tenofovir alafenamide
TB=tuberculosis
TDF=tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
TFV=tenofovir
TFV-DP=tenofovir diphosphate
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Biktarvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/biktarvy/biktarvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Gilead Medical Information at:
☎1‐866‐MEDI‐GSI (1‐866‐633‐4474) or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries besides your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact gilead.privacy@gilead.com.
BIKTARVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2026 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 7