TRO 2L Monotherapy Use in Cisplatin- or Platinum-Ineligible mUC
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
2L Monotherapy Use in Cisplatin- or Platinum-Ineligible mUC
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
Trodelvy is not indicated for use in patients with mUC. The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Summary
Clinical Data on SG as 2L Monotherapy in Cis- or PLT-Ineligible Patients
TROPHY-U-01 is an ongoing, global, phase 2, multi-cohort, open-label study of SG in patients with unresectable locally advanced or mUC. Approximately 827 patients are anticipated to be enrolled.1
Cohort 2 of TROPHY-U-01 is evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in patients with mUC who were ineligible for PLT-based chemotherapy and progressed after previous CPIs in the 1L metastatic setting. Data from 38 patients were included in the preliminary analysis.2
- Treatment with SG resulted in an ORR of 32% (12/38; 95% CI: 17.5–48.7), a median (range) PFS of 5.6 (4.1–8.3) months, a median (95% CI) OS of 13.5 (7.6–15.6) months, and a median DOR of 5.6 months (n=12; 95% CI: 2.8–13.3).
- A reduction in tumor size was observed in 22 of 32 patients.
- The most common all-grade TEAEs included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, alopecia, and neutropenia.
The phase 1/2 basket study (IMMU-132-01) evaluated the use of SG in adult patients with various advanced epithelial cancers, including patients with mUC (n=49) that was refractory to or relapsed after ≥1 prior treatment.3,4
- Among patients with mUC who received SG 10 mg/kg (n=45), the ORR was 28.9% (95% CI: 16.4–44.3%), and the median PFS and OS were 6.8 and 16.8 months, respectively.3
- In an earlier analysis of patients in the mUC cohort who received SG 10 mg/kg (n=45), the most common (≥5% of patients) Grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia/decreased neutrophil count, anemia, hypophosphatemia, diarrhea, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia.4
Clinical Data on SG as 2L Monotherapy in Cis- or PLT-Ineligible Patients
TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2 in PLT-Ineligible Patients
Study design and demographics
TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973), a global, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 study, is investigating the efficacy and safety of SG in approximately 827 patients with unresectable locally advanced or mUC.1 Results from Cohort 2 are summarized.
Cohort 2 is investigating the role of SG in PLT‑ineligible patients with mUC who have progressed after CPI-only therapy (Figure 1).2
Figure 1. TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2 in 2L+ mUC: Study Design2,5
Abbreviations: 2L+=second line and later; PD-(L)1=programmed death (ligand)-1; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; UC=urothelial cancer.
aDefined as the rate of the best overall response of CR + PR..
bDefined as CR, PR, and SD for ≥6 months.
Preliminary efficacy and safety data for 38 patients were included in this analysis (data cutoff: July 26, 2022). At the time of data cutoff, 36 patients (95%) had discontinued treatment. Of these, 20 patients (53%) discontinued due to PD. See Table 1 for key baseline demographics and disease characteristics.2
Table 1. TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2: Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics2
Key Demographics and Characteristics | Cohort 2 (N=38) | |
Age, median (range), y | 73 (41–87) | |
Male, n (%) | 23 (61) | |
Race, n (%) | White | 31 (82) |
Black | 1 (3) | |
Not provided | 6 (16) | |
ECOG PS 1, n (%) | 19 (50) | |
Site of disease at baseline, n (%) | Visceral metastasis | 25 (66) |
Lung/pleura | 16 (42) | |
Liver | 11 (29) | |
Bone | 3 (8) | |
Other | 6 (16) | |
Tumor stage at screening, | mUC | 25 (66) |
Locoregional only | 13 (34) | |
Bellmunt risk factors,a n (%) | 0 | 11 (29) |
1 | 19 (50) | |
2 | 8 (21) | |
Prior anticancer regimens, median (range), n | 2 (1–5) | |
≤2 prior anticancer regimens, n (%) | 28 (74) | |
Type of prior anticancer regimens, n (%) | CPI | 38 (100) |
PLT-based therapy in (neo)adjuvant setting | 19 (50) | |
Enfortumab vedotin/enfortumab | 6 (16)/1 (3) | |
Erdafitinib | 1 (3) | |
aRisk factors included an ECOG PS >0, liver metastases, and an Hgb level <10 g/dL. | ||
Preliminary efficacy results2
The median (range) follow-up duration was 9.3 (0.5–30.6) months, with a median time to response of 1.4 months and an ORR of 32% (Table 2). In an analysis of prespecified subgroups, ORRs were similar across subgroups, which included those who had >2 previous anticancer therapies (29%; 2/7) vs those who had ≤2 (32%; 10/31). In patients with visceral metastases and those with liver metastases, the ORRs were 20% and 18%, respectively. A reduction in tumor size was observed in 22 of 32 patients per BICR, and an ongoing response was present in 2 patients at the time of data cutoff.
Table 2. TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2: Response Assessment2
Endpoints | Cohort 2 (N=38) | |
ORR, n (%); 95% CI | 12 (32); 17.5–48.7 | |
Best response, n (%) | CR | 0 |
PR | 12 (32) | |
SD | 13 (34) | |
SD for ≥6 moa | 4 (11) | |
PD | 4 (11) | |
Not assessedb | 5 (13) | |
Not evaluablec | 4 (11) | |
CBR,d n (%); 95% CI | 16 (42); 26.3–59.2 | |
DOR, median (range),e mo | 5.6 (2.8–13.3) | |
PFS, median (95% CI), mo | 5.6 (4.1–8.3) | |
OS, median (95% CI), mo | 13.5 (7.6–15.6) | |
aNine patients had SD and were followed for <6 mo.
bPatients who did not have a postbaseline assessment.
cPatients who had one postbaseline imaging assessment but were assigned a best overall response of “not evaluable” per BICR assessment due to imaging quality issue or other reasons not currently provided in the BICR datasets.
dCBR was defined as CR + PR + SD for ≥6 mo.
en=12.
Preliminary safety results2
The most commonly reported TEAEs and key Grade ≥3 TEAEs are listed in Table 3; 87% of patients experienced Grade ≥3 TEAEs. Two cases (5%) of Grade 3 and 1 case (3%) of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred. TEAEs led to SG dose interruption in 61%, dose reduction in 37%, and discontinuation in 21% of patients (diarrhea, n=2; asthenia, colitis, febrile neutropenia, maculopapular rash, nausea, pneumonia, pyrexia, and sepsis, n=1 each). Thirty-six patients (95%) experienced ≥1 TRAE, and Grade ≥3 TRAEs included diarrhea (n=4), colitis (n=3), febrile neutropenia (n=2), and sepsis (n=2; 1 patient had neutropenia). For the patients with a Grade ≥3 TRAE of colitis, the mean duration of time from CPI cessation to SG initiation was 4.2 months; all events were deemed related to SG treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Seventeen patients were receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 7 (18%) for primary prophylaxis and 10 (26%) for secondary prophylaxis.
Table 3. TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2: Most Commonly Reported (>20%) Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs2
TEAE, n (%) | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
Diarrhea | 25 (66) | 5 (13) | 1 (3) |
Nausea | 20 (53) | 1 (3) | 0 |
Fatigue | 19 (50) | 7 (18) | 0 |
Alopecia | 19 (50) | 0 | 0 |
Neutropenia | 17 (45) | 6 (16) | 7 (18) |
Anemia | 15 (40) | 9 (24) | 0 |
Constipation | 15 (40) | 0 | 0 |
Leukopenia | 13 (34) | 3 (8) | 4 (11) |
Decreased appetite | 12 (32) | 0 | 0 |
Urinary tract infection | 11 (29) | 2 (5) | 0 |
Vomiting | 11 (29) | 1 (3) | 0 |
Abdominal pain | 10 (26) | 1 (3) | 0 |
Hypomagnesemia | 10 (26) | 0 | 0 |
Hyponatremia | 9 (24) | 1 (3) | 0 |
Pruritus | 8 (21) | 0 | 0 |
IMMU-132-01 Study in Metastatic Epithelial Cancer
Study design and demographics
The safety and efficacy of SG were evaluated in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 1/2 basket study that enrolled 495 adult patients with metastatic epithelial cancers who had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior standard therapeutic regimen. The median (range) follow‑up duration for the OSP at data cutoff was 8.97 (0.26–55.72) months.3 Overall, patients received SG IV on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles and were treated with SG until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent.3,6,7
A total of 45 patients with mUC received SG 10 mg/kg, 3 received SG 8 mg/kg, and 1 received SG 12 mg/kg.8 Baseline demographics for patients with mUC who received SG 10 mg/kg are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. IMMU-132-01: Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics in the mUC Cohort Who Received SG 10 mg/kg4
Key Demographics and Characteristics | mUC Cohort (n=45) |
Age, median (range), y | 67 (49–90) |
Male, n | 41 |
ECOG PS, 0/1, % | 31/69 |
Prior treatment lines, median (range), n | 2 (1–6) |
PLT based, % | 95 |
CPI based, % | 38 |
Visceral metastases, n | 33 |
Lung/liver/other, n | 27/15/5 |
Efficacy in patients with mUC who received SG 10 mg/kg
In patients in the mUC cohort who received SG 10 mg/kg, the ORR was 28.9%. See Table 5 for details of further response rates in this cohort.3
Table 5. IMMU-132-01: Efficacy Data in the mUC Cohort That Received SG 10 mg/kg3
ORR, | CR/PR/SD, | DOR, | OS, | PFS, | CBR, |
28.9 (16.4–44.3) | 2 (4.4)/11 (24.4)/ | 12.9 (3.8–22.5) | 16.8 (9–21.9) | 6.8 (3.6–9.7) | 20 (44.4) [29.6–60] |
Preliminary efficacy results showed that, among the 33 patients who had visceral involvement, the ORR was 27% (n=9); among CPI‑treated patients, the ORR was 23% (4/17).4
Safety
Results from the mUC cohort4
The most common (≥5% of patients) Grade ≥3 AEs included the following: neutropenia/decreased neutrophil count (38%), anemia (11%), hypophosphatemia (11%), diarrhea (9%), fatigue (9%), and febrile neutropenia (7%).
Results from the OSP3
All patients in the OSP received ≥1 dose of SG at 8, 10, 12, or 18 mg/kg. Nearly all patients (n/N=494/495) experienced ≥1 AE during the study; of these, 97.6% experienced TRAEs (Table 6). Nausea, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, and alopecia were the most commonly reported (≥20%) TRAEs.
Post hoc analyses showed that treatment-related neutropenia of any grade had a median onset of 19 days and a median duration of 8.5 days, as assessed in post hoc analyses. Treatment-related diarrhea of any grade had a median onset of 14 days and a median duration of 8 days.
Table 6. IMMU-132-01: Select TRAEs of Interest in ≥20% of Patients in the OSP3
Event, n (%) | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | |
Any TRAE | 483 (97.6) | 284 (57.4) | 73 (14.7) | |
Gastrointestinal | Nausea | 310 (62.6) | 18 (3.6) | 0 |
Diarrhea | 278 (56.2) | 39 (7.9) | 0 | |
Vomiting | 191 (38.6) | 14 (2.8) | 0 | |
Hematologic | Neutropenia | 286 (57.8) | 143 (28.9) | 67 (13.5) |
Anemia | 173 (34.9) | 51 (10.3) | 0 | |
Febrile neutropeniaa | 27 (5.5) | 21 (4.2) | 5 (1) | |
Systemic/other | Fatigue | 239 (48.3) | 31 (6.3) | 0 |
Alopecia | 200 (40.4) | 0 | 0 | |
aNo Grade 5 febrile neutropenia events were reported. For 1 patient, febrile neutropenia was entered as Grade 2 per investigator assessment; however, it was Grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia by definition.
Overall, 38.8% of study patients in the OSP had an SAE, and 15.2% of the SAEs were considered to be related to treatment. The most common treatment-related SAEs were febrile neutropenia (4%), diarrhea (2.8%), vomiting (1.4%), nausea (1.4%), and neutropenia (1.2%). Dose reductions were required in 32.3% of patients, and 8.3% of patients permanently discontinued treatment due to AEs.
References
Page 1 of 7
1. ClinicalTrials.gov. Phase II Open Label Study of IMMU-132 in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03547973. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03547973. Accessed: 13 February 2026. Last Updated 15 April 2025.
Abbreviations
1L=first line
2L=second line
AE=adverse event
BICR=blinded independent central review
CBR=clinical benefit rate
cis=cisplatin
CPI=checkpoint inhibitor
CR=complete response
DOR=duration of response
ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
mUC=metastatic urothelial cancer
ORR=objective response rate
OS=overall survival
OSP=overall safety population
PD=progressive disease
PFS=progression-free survival
PLT=platinum
PR=partial response
SAE=serious adverse event
SD=stable disease
SG=sacituzumab govitecan-hziy
TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event
TRAE=treatment-related adverse event
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact gilead.privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2026 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 7