Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment of mNSCLC
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment in Patients With mNSCLC
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
Trodelvy is not indicated for use in patients with mNSCLC. The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Summary
EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment
EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, phase 2, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG + pembro ± chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs.1
After a median (range) duration of follow-up of 16.6 (8.5–23.8) months, patients treated with SG + pembro in Cohort A (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%; n=30) as well as those in Cohort B (PD‑L1 TPS <50%; n=62) showed the following (all efficacy results assessed per IRC)1:
- In Cohort A, ORR was 66.7% (95% CI: 47.2–82.7%; NSq, 66.7%; Sq, 66.7%) and median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI: 6.7–NR; NSq, NR; Sq, 10.7 months).
- In Cohort B, ORR was 29% (95% CI: 18.2–41.9%; NSq, 25%; Sq, 34.6%) and median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 4.2–12.9; NSq, 7.4 months; Sq, 7 months).
- Within Cohorts A and B combined, 67 patients had Trop-2 expression data. ORRs were generally similar between Trop-2 subgroups according to median H-scores (<median, 33.3%; ≥median, 35.3%). Median PFS for combined cohorts was also not significantly different between subgroups according to median H-score (<median, 6.9 months; ≥median, 8.48 months; HR, 1.165; 95% CI: 0.59–2.31).
- The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (53.3%), anemia (46.7%), and alopecia (41.3%). Immune-mediated TEAEs included pneumonitis (8.7%), hyperthyroidism (3.3%), colitis (3.3%), and myocarditis (2.2%).
EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment
Study Design and Demographics
EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter, multicohort, phase 2 study (NCT05186974) evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG with pembro ± chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs (Figure 1). Patients from Cohorts A and B received SG + pembro. Select baseline characteristics and exposure are shown in Table 1.1
Figure 1. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Study Design1,2
Abbreviations: DCR=disease control rate; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Note: DCR and overall survival data were not presented in the current publication.
Table 1. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Select Baseline Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Study Drug Exposure1
Key Demographics and Characteristics | Cohort A (n=30) | Cohort B (n=62) | |
Age, median (range), years | 67 (47–77) | 68 (32–80) | |
Male, % | 80 | 69.4 | |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0/1, % | 20/80 | 33.9/66.1 | |
Histology, NSq/Sq, % | 60/40 | 58.1/41.9 | |
Stage at diagnosis, I–III/IV/unknown, % | 16.7/80/3.3 | 14.5/83.9/1.6 | |
Brain metastasis at diagnosis, % | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Tobacco use status, never/current/former, % | 10/33.3/56.7 | 19.4/35.5/45.2 | |
Exposure duration, median (range), months | SG | 5.44 (0.03–23.36) | |
Pembro | 4.86 (0.03–23.13) | ||
Number of cycles, median (range) | SG | 8 (1–33) | |
Pembro | 7.5 (1–33) | ||
Efficacy
The median (range) duration of follow-up was 16.6 (8.5–23.8) months, and the median follow-up durations in Cohorts A and B were 17.4 and 16.1 months, respectively. At the data cutoff date (June 3, 2024), 46.7% and 51.6% of patients in Cohorts A and B, respectively, were continuing in the study.1
Efficacy outcomes by cohort and by PD-L1 expression and histology are shown in Table 2.1
Table 2. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Efficacy Outcomes Overall and by Histology and PD-L1 Expression1
Efficacy Outcomes | Cohort A | Cohort B | ||||||
Overall | NSq | Sq | Overall (n=62) | NSq | Sq | TPS | TPS <1% (n=29) | |
ORR,a % | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 29 | 25 | 34.6 | 36.4 | 20.7 |
CR, n (%) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (5.6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PR, n (%) | 19 (63.3) | 11 (61.1) | 8 (66.7) | 18 (29) | 9 (25) | 9 (34.6) | 12 (36.4) | 6 (20.7) |
SD, n (%) | 6 (20) | 4 (22.2) | 2 (16.7) | 23 (37.1) | 16 (44.4) | 7 (26.9) | 14 (42.4) | 9 (31) |
PD, n (%) | 3 (10) | 1 (5.6) | 2 (16.7) | 9 (14.5) | 4 (11.1) | 5 (19.2) | 3 (9.1) | 6 (20.7) |
NE,b n (%) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (5.6) | 0 | 12 (19.4) | 7 (19.4) | 5 (19.2) | 4 (12.1) | 8 (27.6) |
PFS,a | 13.1 | NR | 10.7 | 7 | 7.4 | 7 | 9.1 | 4.9 |
DOR,a | NR | NR | NR | 11.9 | 7.9 | NR | Not | Not |
Abbreviations: PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.
aAssessed by IRC. bIncluded not assessed.
Efficacy by Trop-2 expression
An exploratory analysis evaluated efficacy by Trop-2 expression measured on archival tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and reported as an H-score of 0 to 300. From Cohorts A and B combined, Trop-2 expression data were available for 67 patients, and H-scores were similar between cohorts (P=0.155) and across NSq and Sq histologies (P=0.193). There were no differences in H-scores when PD‑L1 TPS subgroups were compared: TPS <1% vs 1% to 49% (P=0.671); TPS <1% vs ≥50% (P=0.203); and TPS 1% to 49% vs ≥50% (P=0.317). In the combined cohort analysis population, ORRs by IRC were generally similar between subgroups according to median H-scores (Table 3). Higher Trop-2 expression was associated with numerically higher ORRs in patients with Sq histology relative to those with NSq histology; however, subgroup numbers were small.1
Table 3. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B (Combined; n=67): ORR per IRC According to Trop‑2 Subgroups Overall and by Histology1
Parameter | Trop-2 | ORR, n/N (%) | ||
Overall | NSq | Sq | ||
H-score (median=178) | <Median | 11/33 (33.3) | 5/17 (29.4) | 6/16 (37.5) |
≥Median | 12/34 (35.3) | 6/21 (28.6) | 6/13 (46.2) | |
I2 + I3 (median=79%) | <50% | 8/21 (38.1) | 5/12 (41.7) | 3/9 (33.3) |
≥50% | 15/46 (32.6) | 6/26 (23.1) | 9/20 (45) | |
<75% | 10/28 (35.7) | 5/15 (33.3) | 5/13 (38.5) | |
≥75% | 13/39 (33.3) | 6/23 (26.1) | 7/16 (43.8) | |
I1 + I2 + I3 (median=90%) | <50% | 7/18 (38.9) | 5/11 (45.5) | 2/7 (28.6) |
≥50% | 16/49 (32.7) | 6/27 (22.2) | 10/22 (45.5) | |
<75% | 10/24 (41.7) | 5/11 (45.5) | 5/13 (38.5) | |
≥75% | 13/43 (30.2) | 6/27 (22.2) | 7/16 (43.8) | |
Abbreviations: I=intensity score; I1=weak Trop-2 expression; I2=moderate Trop-2 expression; I3=strong Trop-2 expression.
Note: H-score was calculated as follows: I1 + I2 × 2 + I3 × 3. Patients who had 13 weeks of follow-up (defined as [data cutoff date – first dose date + 1]/7) at the time of the data cutoff were included.
PFS by IRC was not significantly different between Trop-2 subgroups according to the median H‑score, and PFS according to histology is shown in Table 4.1
Table 4. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: PFS per IRC According toTrop-2 Subgroups in Combined Cohorts and by Histology1,3
Parameter | Trop-2 | PFS, Median (95% CI), Months | ||
Cohorts A and B | NSq | Sq | ||
H-score (median=178) | <Median | n=33; 6.9 (5.5–NE) | n=17; 6.9 (5.5–NE) | n=16; NE (1.4–NE) |
≥Median | n=34; 8.48 (4.2–12.9) | n=21; 11.07 (3.4–NE) | n=13; 6.97 (1.2–NE) | |
HR (95% CI) | 1.165 (0.588–2.31) | 0.889 (0.351–2.249) | 1.745 (0.626–4.865) | |
Most patients in each cohort showed a reduction in the best percent change from baseline in the total sum of the target lesion’s diameter. There was no association between Trop-2 H‑score and the percent change in tumor size in either cohort (A, rs=-0.056; B, rs=-0.182) or in the combined cohorts (A and B, rs=-0.013).1
Safety1
Any-grade TEAEs were reported for all patients in the safety analysis set (patients who received ≥1 dose of any study drug; Table 5). The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (53.3%), anemia (46.7%), and alopecia (41.3%). Immune-mediated TEAEs that occurred in >1 patient were pneumonitis (8.7%), hyperthyroidism (3.3%), colitis (3.3%), and myocarditis (2.2%). Additional TEAE data are summarized in Table 6.
Table 5. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B (Combined): Summary of Safety1
Outcomes, n (%) | Cohorts A and B (N=92) |
Any-grade TEAEs | 92 (100) |
Grade ≥3 TEAEs | 70 (76.1) |
TEAEs related to any study drug | 84 (91.3) |
Grade ≥3 TEAEs related to any study drug | 42 (45.7) |
Serious TEAEs | 58 (63) |
Serious TEAEs related to any study drug | 19 (20.7) |
TEAEs that led to discontinuation of any study drug | 25 (27.2) |
TEAEs that led to discontinuation of SG | 22 (23.9) |
TEAEs that led to discontinuation of pembro | 21 (22.8) |
TEAEs that led to SG dose reduction | 16 (17.4) |
TEAEs that led to dose interruptions of any study drug | 65 (70.7) |
TEAEs that led to dose interruption of SG | 64 (69.6) |
TEAEs that led to dose interruption of pembro | 51 (55.4) |
TEAEs that led to death | 8 (8.7) |
TEAEs related to any study drug that led to death | 3 (3.3)a |
aNeutropenic sepsis, n=2; sepsis, n=1.
Table 6. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Grade 1–2 (≥20%), Grade ≥3 (≥5%), and
Immune-Mediated TEAEs1
TEAEs, % | Grade 1–2 | Grade ≥3 | |
Diarrhea | 45.7 | 7.6 | |
Anemia | 42.4 | 4.3 | |
Alopecia | 41.3 | 0 | |
Asthenia | 30.4 | 1.1 | |
Nausea | 30.4 | 1.1 | |
Constipation | 23.9 | 0 | |
Decreased appetite | 22.8 | 4.3 | |
Fatigue | 22.8 | 3.3 | |
Decreased weight | 21.7 | 2.2 | |
Cough | 21.7 | 0 | |
Respiratory tract infection | 17.4 | 5.4 | |
Dyspnea | 12 | 5.4 | |
Neutropenia | 10.9 | 17.4 | |
Decreased neutrophil count | 4.3 | 9.8 | |
Pneumonia | 3.3 | 10.9 | |
Immune-mediated | Pneumonitis | 5.4 | 3.3 |
Hyperthyroidism | 3.3 | 0 | |
Colitis | 2.2 | 1.1 | |
Myocarditis | 1.1 | 1.1 | |
Ongoing Study: EVOKE-03
A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study (NCT05609968) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in combination with pembro vs pembro monotherapy as 1L treatment in adults with mNSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50%.
References
- Reck M, Patel JD, Gray JE, et al. First-line sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC: PD-L1 TPS <50% and ≥50% cohorts of the EVOKE-02 study [Published online ahead of print October 29, 2025]. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;30:S1556-0864(25)02890-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41173143
- ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of sacituzumab govitecan combinations in first-line treatment of participants with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (EVOKE-02). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186974. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05186974.
- Reck M, Patel JD, Gray JE, et al. First-line sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC: PD-L1 TPS <50% and ≥50% cohorts of the EVOKE-02 study [Supplementary Materials]. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;30:S1556-0864(25)02890-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41173143
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 6
1L=first line
AGA=actionable genomic alteration
CR=complete response
DOR=duration of response
H-score=histochemical score
HR=hazard ratio
IRC=independent review committee
mNSCLC=metastatic non‑small cell lung cancer
NE=not evaluable
NR=not reached
NSq=nonsquamous
ORR=objective response rate
PD=progressive disease
PD-L1=programmed cell death ligand-1
Pembro=pembrolizumab
PFS=progression-free survival
SG=sacituzumab govitecan‑hziy
Sq=squamous
TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event
TPS=tumor proportion score
Trop-2=trophoblast cell surface antigen-2
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact gilead.privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2026 Gilead Sciences, Inc
Page 1 of 6