Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment of mNSCLC

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.

Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)

Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment in Patients With mNSCLC

This document is in response to your request for information regarding the use of Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy [SG]) in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) for first-line (1L) treatment in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.

Trodelvy is not indicated for use in patients with mNSCLC. The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.

Summary

EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment

EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, phase 2, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG + pembro ± chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs.1

After a median (range) duration of follow-up of 16.6 (8.5–23.8) months, patients treated with SG + pembro in Cohort A (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%; n=30) as well as those in Cohort B (PDL1 TPS <50%; n=62) showed the following (all efficacy results assessed per IRC)1:

  • In Cohort A, ORR was 66.7% (95% CI: 47.2–82.7%; NSq, 66.7%; Sq, 66.7%) and median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI: 6.7–NR; NSq, NR; Sq, 10.7 months).
  • In Cohort B, ORR was 29% (95% CI: 18.2–41.9%; NSq, 25%; Sq, 34.6%) and median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 4.2–12.9; NSq, 7.4 months; Sq, 7 months).
  • Within Cohorts A and B combined, 67 patients had Trop-2 expression data. ORRs were generally similar between Trop-2 subgroups according to median H-scores (<median, 33.3%; ≥median, 35.3%). Median PFS for combined cohorts was also not significantly different between subgroups according to median H-score (<median, 6.9 months; ≥median, 8.48 months; HR, 1.165; 95% CI: 0.59–2.31).
  • The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (53.3%), anemia (46.7%), and alopecia (41.3%). Immune-mediated TEAEs included pneumonitis (8.7%), hyperthyroidism (3.3%), colitis (3.3%), and myocarditis (2.2%).

EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment

Study Design and Demographics


EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter, multicohort, phase 2 study (NCT05186974) evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG with pembro ± chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs (Figure 1). Patients from Cohorts A and B received SG + pembro. Select baseline characteristics and exposure are shown in Table 1.1

Figure 1. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Study Design1,2

Abbreviations: DCR=disease control rate; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Note: DCR and overall survival data were not presented in the current publication.

Table 1. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Select Baseline Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Study Drug Exposure1

Key Demographics and Characteristics

Cohort A (n=30)

Cohort B (n=62)

Age, median (range), years

67 (47–77)

68 (32–80)

Male, %

80

69.4

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0/1, %

20/80

33.9/66.1

Histology, NSq/Sq, %

60/40

58.1/41.9

Stage at diagnosis, I–III/IV/unknown, %

16.7/80/3.3

14.5/83.9/1.6

Brain metastasis at diagnosis, %

6.7

6.5

Tobacco use status, never/current/former, %

10/33.3/56.7

19.4/35.5/45.2

Exposure duration, median (range), months

SG

5.44 (0.03–23.36)

Pembro

4.86 (0.03–23.13)

Number of cycles, median (range)

SG

8 (1–33)

Pembro

7.5 (1–33)

Efficacy

The median (range) duration of follow-up was 16.6 (8.5–23.8) months, and the median follow-up durations in Cohorts A and B were 17.4 and 16.1 months, respectively. At the data cutoff date (June 3, 2024), 46.7% and 51.6% of patients in Cohorts A and B, respectively, were continuing in the study.1

Efficacy outcomes by cohort and by PD-L1 expression and histology are shown in Table 2.1

Table 2. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Efficacy Outcomes Overall and by Histology and PD-L1 Expression1

Efficacy Outcomes

Cohort A

Cohort B

Overall
(n=30)

NSq
(n=18)

Sq
(n=12)

Overall (n=62)

NSq
(n=36)

Sq
(n=26)

TPS
1–‍49% (n=33)

TPS <1% (n=29)

ORR,a %
(95% CI)

66.7
(47.2–82.7)

66.7
(41–86.7)

66.7
(34.9–90.1)

29
(18.2–41.9)

25
(12.1–42.2)

34.6
(17.2–55.7)

36.4
(20.4–54.9)

20.7
(8–39.7)

CR, n (%)

1 (3.3)

1 (5.6)

0

0

0

0

0

0

PR, n (%)

19 (63.3)

11 (61.1)

8 (66.7)

18 (29)

9 (25)

9 (34.6)

12 (36.4)

6 (20.7)

SD, n (%)

6 (20)

4 (22.2)

2 (16.7)

23 (37.1)

16 (44.4)

7 (26.9)

14 (42.4)

9 (31)

PD, n (%)

3 (10)

1 (5.6)

2 (16.7)

9 (14.5)

4 (11.1)

5 (19.2)

3 (9.1)

6 (20.7)

NE,b n (%)

1 (3.3)

1 (5.6)

0

12 (19.4)

7 (19.4)

5 (19.2)

4 (12.1)

8 (27.6)

PFS,a
median (95% CI), months

13.1
(6.7–NR)

NR
(5.5–NR)

10.7
(1.2–NR)

7
(4.2–12.9)

7.4
(4.1–9.7)

7
(2.7–NR)

9.1
(5.4–NR)

4.9
(1.6–9.2)

DOR,a
median (95% CI), months

NR
(9.4–NR)

NR
(4.6–NR)

NR
(2.4–NR)

11.9
(6.9–NR)

7.9
(2.8–NR)

NR
(2.9–NR)

Not
available

Not
available

Abbreviations: PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.

aAssessed by IRC. bIncluded not assessed.

Efficacy by Trop-2 expression

An exploratory analysis evaluated efficacy by Trop-2 expression measured on archival tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and reported as an H-score of 0 to 300. From Cohorts A and B combined, Trop-2 expression data were available for 67 patients, and H-scores were similar between cohorts (P=0.155) and across NSq and Sq histologies (P=0.193). There were no differences in H-scores when PDL1 TPS subgroups were compared: TPS <1% vs 1% to 49% (P=0.671); TPS <1% vs ≥50% (P=0.203); and TPS 1% to 49% vs ≥50% (P=0.317). In the combined cohort analysis population, ORRs by IRC were generally similar between subgroups according to median H-scores (Table 3). Higher Trop-2 expression was associated with numerically higher ORRs in patients with Sq histology relative to those with NSq histology; however, subgroup numbers were small.1

Table 3. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B (Combined; n=67): ORR per IRC According to Trop2 Subgroups Overall and by Histology1

Parameter

Trop-2

ORR, n/N (%)

Overall

NSq

Sq

H-score (median=178)

<Median

11/33 (33.3)

5/17 (29.4)

6/16 (37.5)

≥Median

12/34 (35.3)

6/21 (28.6)

6/13 (46.2)

I2 + I3 (median=79%)

<50%

8/21 (38.1)

5/12 (41.7)

3/9 (33.3)

≥50%

15/46 (32.6)

6/26 (23.1)

9/20 (45)

<75%

10/28 (35.7)

5/15 (33.3)

5/13 (38.5)

≥75%

13/39 (33.3)

6/23 (26.1)

7/16 (43.8)

I1 + I2 + I3 (median=90%)

<50%

7/18 (38.9)

5/11 (45.5)

2/7 (28.6)

≥50%

16/49 (32.7)

6/27 (22.2)

10/22 (45.5)

<75%

10/24 (41.7)

5/11 (45.5)

5/13 (38.5)

≥75%

13/43 (30.2)

6/27 (22.2)

7/16 (43.8)

Abbreviations: I=intensity score; I1=weak Trop-2 expression; I2=moderate Trop-2 expression; I3=strong Trop-2 expression.

Note: H-score was calculated as follows: I1 + I2 × 2 + I3 × 3. Patients who had 13 weeks of follow-up (defined as [data cutoff date  first dose date + 1]/7) at the time of the data cutoff were included.

PFS by IRC was not significantly different between Trop-2 subgroups according to the median Hscore, and PFS according to histology is shown in Table 4.1

Table 4. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: PFS per IRC According toTrop-2 Subgroups in Combined Cohorts and by Histology1,3

Parameter

Trop-2

PFS, Median (95% CI), Months

Cohorts A and B

NSq

Sq

H-score (median=178)

<Median

n=33; 6.9 (5.5–NE)

n=17; 6.9 (5.5–NE)

n=16; NE (1.4–NE)

≥Median

n=34; 8.48 (4.2–12.9)

n=21; 11.07 (3.4–NE)

n=13; 6.97 (1.2–NE)

HR (95% CI)

1.165 (0.588–2.31)

0.889 (0.351–2.249)

1.745 (0.626–4.865)

Most patients in each cohort showed a reduction in the best percent change from baseline in the total sum of the target lesion’s diameter. There was no association between Trop-2 Hscore and the percent change in tumor size in either cohort (A, rs=-0.056; B, rs=-0.182) or in the combined cohorts (A and B, rs=-0.013).1

Safety1

Any-grade TEAEs were reported for all patients in the safety analysis set (patients who received ≥1 dose of any study drug; Table 5). The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (53.3%), anemia (46.7%), and alopecia (41.3%). Immune-mediated TEAEs that occurred in >1 patient were pneumonitis (8.7%), hyperthyroidism (3.3%), colitis (3.3%), and myocarditis (2.2%). Additional TEAE data are summarized in Table 6.

Table 5. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B (Combined): Summary of Safety1

Outcomes, n (%)

Cohorts A and B (N=92)

Any-grade TEAEs

92 (100)

Grade ≥3 TEAEs

70 (76.1)

TEAEs related to any study drug

84 (91.3)

Grade ≥3 TEAEs related to any study drug

42 (45.7)

Serious TEAEs

58 (63)

Serious TEAEs related to any study drug

19 (20.7)

TEAEs that led to discontinuation of any study drug

25 (27.2)

TEAEs that led to discontinuation of SG

22 (23.9)

TEAEs that led to discontinuation of pembro

21 (22.8)

TEAEs that led to SG dose reduction

16 (17.4)

TEAEs that led to dose interruptions of any study drug

65 (70.7)

TEAEs that led to dose interruption of SG

64 (69.6)

TEAEs that led to dose interruption of pembro

51 (55.4)

TEAEs that led to death

8 (8.7)

TEAEs related to any study drug that led to death

3 (3.3)a

aNeutropenic sepsis, n=2; sepsis, n=1.

Table 6. EVOKE-02 Cohorts A and B: Grade 1–2 (≥20%), Grade ≥3 (≥5%), and
Immune-Mediated TEAEs1

TEAEs, %

Grade 1–2

Grade ≥3

Diarrhea

45.7

7.6

Anemia

42.4

4.3

Alopecia

41.3

0

Asthenia

30.4

1.1

Nausea

30.4

1.1

Constipation

23.9

0

Decreased appetite

22.8

4.3

Fatigue

22.8

3.3

Decreased weight

21.7

2.2

Cough

21.7

0

Respiratory tract infection

17.4

5.4

Dyspnea

12

5.4

Neutropenia

10.9

17.4

Decreased neutrophil count

4.3

9.8

Pneumonia

3.3

10.9

Immune-mediated

Pneumonitis

5.4

3.3

Hyperthyroidism

3.3

0

Colitis

2.2

1.1

Myocarditis

1.1

1.1

Ongoing Study: EVOKE-03

A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study (NCT05609968) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in combination with pembro vs pembro monotherapy as 1L treatment in adults with mNSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50%.

References

  1. Reck M, Patel JD, Gray JE, et al. First-line sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC: PD-L1 TPS <50% and ≥50% cohorts of the EVOKE-02 study [Published online ahead of print October 29, 2025]. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;30:S1556-0864(25)02890-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41173143
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of sacituzumab govitecan combinations in first-line treatment of participants with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (EVOKE-02). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186974. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05186974.
  3. Reck M, Patel JD, Gray JE, et al. First-line sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC: PD-L1 TPS <50% and ≥50% cohorts of the EVOKE-02 study [Supplementary Materials]. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;30:S1556-0864(25)02890-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41173143

Abbreviations

Page 1 of 6


1L=first line
AGA=actionable genomic alteration
CR=complete response
DOR=duration of response
H-score=histochemical score
HR=hazard ratio
IRC=independent review committee
mNSCLC=metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer
NE=not evaluable
NR=not reached
NSq=nonsquamous
ORR=objective response rate
PD=progressive disease
PD-L1=programmed cell death ligand-1
Pembro=pembrolizumab
PFS=progression-free survival

SG=sacituzumab govitecanhziy
Sq=squamous
TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event
TPS=tumor proportion score
Trop-2=trophoblast cell surface antigen-2

 

 


 

Product Label

For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.

Follow-Up

For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:

1888-983-4668 or   www.askgileadmedical.com

Adverse Event Reporting

Please report all adverse events to:

Gilead Global Patient Safety 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event

FDA MedWatch Program by 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or   www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch

Data Privacy

The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.

It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact gilead.privacy@gilead.com.

TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2026 Gilead Sciences, Inc

Page 1 of 6