Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment of mNSCLC
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Combination With Pembrolizumab for 1L Treatment in Patients With mNSCLC
Trodelvy is not indicated for use in patients with mNSCLC. The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Summary
EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment
EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, phase 2, multi-cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in combination with pembro ± PLT agent in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs.1
Preliminary analyses of patients treated with SG + pembro in Cohort A (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%; n=30) and Cohort B (PD‑L1 TPS <50%; n=33) showed the following1,2:
- In Cohort A, ORR was 69% (95% CI: 49–85%; Sq, 72.7%; Nsq, 66.7%) and DCR was 86% (95% CI: 68–96%; Sq, 81.8%; Nsq, 88.9%).
- In Cohort B, ORR was 44% (95% CI: 26–62%; Sq, 53.8%; Nsq, 36.8%) and DCR was 78% (95% CI: 60–91%; Sq, 84.6%; Nsq, 73.7%).
- The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (54%), anemia (48%), asthenia (38%), and alopecia (37%). Immune-mediated TEAEs that occurred in ≥5% of patients were pneumonitis (8%) and hyperthyroidism (5%).
In an analysis with extended follow-up for Cohort A (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%; n=30)3:
- Overall ORR was 66.7% (95% CI: 47.2–82.7%) and was consistent in patients with both Sq and Nsq histology.
- Median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI: 5.5–NR).
- The most common any-grade TEAEs were diarrhea (56.7%), alopecia, anemia, and asthenia (each, 50%), and the most common immune-mediated TEAE was pneumonitis (16.7%).
An exploratory analysis with a later data cutoff date evaluated Trop-2 expression and no patient subgroup was identified that had a greater treatment benefit (eg, ORR or PFS) with SG + pembro.4
EVOKE-02 Study: SG + Pembro for 1L Treatment
Study Design and Demographics
EVOKE-02 is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter, multicohort, phase 2 study (NCT05186974) evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in combination with pembro ± PLT agent (eg, carboplatin) in the 1L treatment of adult patients with advanced or mNSCLC without AGAs (Figure 1).1
Figure 1. EVOKE-02: Study Design5,6
Abbreviations: NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Select baseline characteristics and exposure are shown in Table 1.1,2
Table 1. EVOKE-02 (Cohorts A and B):
Select Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics1,2
Key Demographics and Characteristics | Cohort A (n=30) | Cohort B (n=33) | |
Age, median (range), years | 67 (47–77) | 68 (47–80) | |
Male, % | 80 | 79 | |
Histology, Nsq/Sq, % | 60/40 | 61/39 | |
Stage at diagnosis, I–III/IV, % | 17/80 | 15/85 | |
Treatment duration,a | SG | 4.1 (0–11.2+) | 4.1 (0–11.9+) |
Pembro | 3.6 (0–11.2+) | 3.8 (0–11.7+) | |
aPatients received a median (range) of 6 (1–17+) cycles of SG and pembro.
Preliminary Results: Cohort A and Cohort B
Efficacy
The median (range) follow-up durations for Cohorts A and B were 5 (1.7–12) and 5.8 (1–12.2) months, respectively. Efficacy results were reported for 61 patients enrolled for ≥13 weeks (Table 2)1 and reported according to PD-L1 TPS subgroup in Cohort B (Table 3). In patients who achieved a confirmed PR, the mean (standard deviation) time to response was 1.8 (0.82) months in Cohort A and 1.7 (0.6) months in Cohort B.7
Table 2. EVOKE-02 (Cohorts A and B): Efficacy by Investigator Assessment1,2
Cohort A | Cohort B | All Patients | |
All histologies | n=29 | n=32 | N=61 |
ORR (BOR of CR + PR), % (95% CI) | 69 (49–85) | 44 (26–62) | 56 (42–69) |
PR (confirmed and unconfirmed), n (%) | 20 (69) | 14 (44) | 34 (56) |
PR (confirmed), n (%) | 18 (62) | 12 (38) | 30 (49) |
SD, n (%) | 5 (17) | 11 (34) | 16 (26) |
PD, n (%) | 3 (10) | 2 (6) | 5 (8) |
DCR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 weeks), % (95% CI) | 86 (68–96) | 78 (60–91) | 82 (70–91) |
DOR,b median (95% CI), months | NR (5.6–NR) | NR (3.5–NR) | NR (7.9–NR) |
DOR rate at 6 months,b % (95% CI) | 88 (39–98) | 88 (39–98) | 87 (58–97) |
Sq mNSCLC | n=11 | n=13 | N/A |
ORR, % (95% CI) | 72.7 (39–94) | 53.8 (25.1–80.8) | N/A |
DCR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 weeks), % (95% CI) | 81.8 (48.2–97.7) | 84.6 (54.6–98.1) | N/A |
Nsq mNSCLC | n=18 | n=19 | N/A |
ORR, % (95% CI) | 66.7 (41–86.7) | 36.8 (16.3–61.6) | N/A |
DCR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 weeks), % (95% CI) | 88.9 (65.3–98.6) | 73.7 (48.8–90.9) | N/A |
aPatients without tumor assessment: Cohort A, n=1 (Nsq); Cohort B, n=5 (Sq, n=2; Nsq, n=3).
bEvaluated in patients with a confirmed CR or PR; based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Table 3. EVOKE-02: Cohort B PD-L1 TPS Subgroup Analysis7
Investigator-Assessed Efficacy | PD-L1 TPS 1–49% (n=15) | PD-L1 TPS <1% (n=17)a |
ORR (BOR of CR + PR), % (95% CI) | 53 (27–79) | 35 (14–62) |
DCR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 weeks), % (95% CI) | 100 (78–100) | 59 (33–82) |
aFive patients did not have tumor assessment for PD-L1.
Safety1
TEAEs reported in the safety-evaluable population (patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment; N=63) are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Any-grade TEAEs were reported in all patients, with 90% related to study treatment.
Table 4. EVOKE-02 (Cohort A and B): Summary of TEAEs1
TEAEs, n (%) | All Patients (N=63) |
Serious TEAEs | 34 (54) |
Related to study treatment | 9 (14) |
Led to treatment discontinuations | 11 (18) |
Led to discontinuation of SG/pembro | 9 (14)/8 (13) |
Led to SG dose reductions | 11 (18) |
Led to deatha | 4 (6) |
Related to study treatment | 1 (2) |
aCauses of death: malignant lung neoplasm, respiratory tract infection, sepsis, and sudden death (each, n=1). The case of sepsis that led to death was deemed related to study treatment.
Table 5. EVOKE-02 (Cohort A and B): Any-Grade TEAEs Reported in ≥15% of Patients and Immune-Mediated TEAEs (N=63)1
TEAEs, % | Grade 1–2 | Grade ≥3 | |
Diarrhea | 51 | 3 | |
Anemia | 42 | 6 | |
Asthenia | 38 | 0 | |
Alopecia | 37 | 0 | |
Nausea | 30 | 2 | |
Constipation | 24 | 0 | |
Decreased appetite | 22 | 0 | |
Respiratory tract infection | 20 | 5 | |
Fatigue | 19 | 2 | |
Mucosal inflammation | 18 | 0 | |
Dyspnea | 17 | 5 | |
Neutropenia | 9 | 18 | |
Immune-mediated | Pneumonitisa | 5 | 3 |
Hyperthyroidism | 5 | 0 | |
Colitis | 2 | 2 | |
Hypothyroidism | 2 | 0 | |
Maculopapular rash | 0 | 2 | |
Nephritis | 0 | 2 | |
aGrade 3 pneumonitis (n=2) was the highest grade TEAE observed to date.
Extended Follow-Up: Cohort A (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%)3
Efficacy
In this analysis, the median (range) follow-up was 11.3 (8.4–17.5) months, and median (range) durations of exposure to SG and pembro were 7.43 (0.03–16.69) months and 7.18 (0.03–16.69) months, respectively. Efficacy by IRC is shown in Table 6.
Table 6. EVOKE-02 Cohort A Extended Follow-Up: Efficacy3
Efficacy by IRC | Overall (n=30) | Sq mNSCLC (n=12) | Nsq mNSCLC (n=18) |
ORR, n (%) [95% CI] | 20 (66.7) | 8 (66.7) | 12 (66.7) |
CR, n (%) | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1 (5.6) |
PR, n (%) | 19 (63.3) | 8 (66.7) | 11 (61.1) |
SD, n (%) | 6 (20) | 2 (16.7) | 4 (22.2) |
PD, n (%) | 3 (10) | 2 (16.7) | 1 (5.6) |
NE, n (%) | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1 (5.6) |
PFS, median (95% CI), months | 13.1 (5.5–NR) | NR (1.2–NR) | 13.1 (5.5–NR) |
12-month PFS, % (95% CI) | 57.2 (35.6–73.9) | 58.3 (21.2–82.9) | 56.3 (29.3–76.4) |
DOR, median (95% CI), months | NR (8.5–NR) | NR (2.4–NR) | NR (4.6–NR) |
12-month DOR, % (95% CI) | 59.3 (27.4–81) | 75 (31.5–93.1) | 56.6 (19.7–81.9) |
DCR (CR + PR + SD ≥6 weeks), n (%) [95% CI] | 26 (86.7) | 10 (83.3) | 16 (88.9) |
Safety
Any-grade TEAEs were reported in all patients, with 96.7% related to study treatment. TEAEs are shown in Table 7 and Table 8.
Table 7. EVOKE-02 Cohort A Extended Follow-Up: Summary of TEAEs3
TEAEs, n (%) | Cohort A (n=30) |
Serious TEAEs | 15 (50) |
Treatment-related | 5 (16.7) |
Led to treatment discontinuation of either study drug | 6 (20) |
Led to discontinuation of SG/pembro | 5 (16.7)/6 (20) |
Led to SG dose reductions | 6 (20) |
Led to deatha | 1 (3.3) |
Treatment-related | 1 (3.3) |
aThe 1 treatment-related death was due to neutropenic sepsis.
Table 8. EVOKE-02 Cohort A Extended Follow-Up:
Any-Grade (≥30%), Grade 3 (≥5%), and Immune-Mediated TEAEs (n=30)3
TEAEs, % | Grade 1–2 | Grade ≥3 | |
Alopecia | 50 | 0 | |
Anemia | 50 | 0 | |
Asthenia | 50 | 0 | |
Diarrhea | 46.7 | 10 | |
Nausea | 43.4 | 3.3 | |
Constipation | 33.3 | 0 | |
Decreased appetite | 33.3 | 0 | |
Fatigue | 30 | 0 | |
Dyspnea | 26.7 | 3.3 | |
Neutropenia | 13.3 | 16.7 | |
Pulmonary embolism | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
Respiratory failure | 0 | 10 | |
Immune-mediateda | Pneumonitis | 10 | 6.7 |
Colitis | 3.3 | 0 | |
Hyperthyroidism | 3.3 | 0 | |
Hypothyroidism | 3.3 | 0 | |
Maculopapular rash | 3.3 | 0 | |
aThere were no reports of nephritis.
Subanalysis: Efficacy by Trop-2 Expression4
An exploratory analysis with a later data cutoff date evaluated efficacy outcomes according to Trop-2 expression. Trop-2 membrane expression on archival tumor tissue was assessed with immunohistochemistry and expressed as an H-score of 0 to 300. Trop-2 expression was assessed for association with ORR and PFS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 184 patients with evaluable archival tissue. With a median Trop-2 H‑score of 178, outcomes were assessed in H-score groups of <178 and ≥178. To boost the numbers for subgroup analyses, Trop-2 subgroups from Cohorts A + B + C + D were combined to correlate with evaluated efficacy outcomes.
In patients who received SG + pembro, there was no correlation between Trop-2 expression and best percentage change in tumor size (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ=-0.013) or BOR. Trop-2 expression ≥ median H-score was not significantly associated with improved PFS or ORR (Table 9).
Table 9. EVOKE-02 Subanalysis of Trop-2 Status: Efficacy4
Efficacy Outcomes | SG + Pembro | ||
Trop-2 H-Score <178 | Trop-2 H-Score ≥178 | ||
ORR, n (%) [95% CI] | 11 (33.3) [18–51.8] | 12 (35.3) [19.7–53.5] | |
PFS | Median (95% CI), months | 6.9 (5.5–NE) | 8.5 (4.2–12.9) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 1.17 (0.59–2.31) | ||
Ongoing Study: EVOKE-03
A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study (NCT05609968) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in combination with pembro vs pembro monotherapy as 1L treatment in adults with mNSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50%.
References
- Cho BC, Dols MC, Reyes Cabanillas R. Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in 1L metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results of the EVOKE-02 study. [Oral Presentation OA05.04]. Presented at World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC); September 9-12; Singapore. 2023.
- Cappuzzo F, Patel J, Cho BC, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy results by histology from the EVOKE-02 study [Poster 60P]. Presented at: 2024 European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC); March 20-23, 2024; Prague, Czech Republic.
- Patel JD, Cho BC, Dols MC, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥50%: Cohort A of EVOKE-02 [Poster 8592]. Presented at: 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); May 31-June 4, 2024; Chicago, IL.
- Patel J, Zavodovskaya M, Chul Cho B, et al. Trop-2 expression and association with efficacy in patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin in the EVOKE-02 study of non-small cell lung cancer (Poster LB399). Presented at: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR); April 25-30, 2025; Chicago, IL, USA.
- Cho BC, Dols MC, Reyes Cabanillas R, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in 1L metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results of the EVOKE-02 study. [Oral Presentation OA05.04]. Presented at: 2023 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC); September 9-12, 2023; Singapore.
- ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of sacituzumab govitecan combinations in first-line treatment of participants with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (EVOKE-02). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186974. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05186974.
- Patel J, Cho BC, Dols MC, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in 1L metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: preliminary results of the EVOKE-02 study [Poster PP01.113]. Presented at: 2023 North America Conference on Lung Cancer (NACLC); December 1-3, 2023; Chicago, IL.
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 7
1L=first line
AGA=actionable genomic alteration
BOR=best overall response
CR=complete response
DCR=disease control rate
DOR=duration of response
H-score=histochemical score
IRC=independent review committee
mNSCLC=metastatic non‑small cell lung cancer
NE=not evaluable
NR=not reached
Nsq=nonsquamous
ORR=objective response rate
PD=progressive disease
PD-L1=programmed cell death-1
pembro=pembrolizumab
PFS=progression-free survival
PLT=platinum
PR=partial response
SD=stable disease
SG=sacituzumab govitecan-hziy
Sq=squamous
TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event
TPS=tumor proportion score
Trop-2=trophoblast cell surface antigen-2
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc
Page 1 of 7