Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Efficacy and Safety by HER2 Status in Patients With mTNBC
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Efficacy and Safety by HER2 Status in Patients With mTNBC
This document is in response to your request for information about Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy [SG]) and its efficacy and safety by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi
Summary
Relevant Product Labeling1
SG is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or mTNBC who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies, ≥1 of them for metastatic disease.
ASCENT: HER2 Analysis in Patients with mTNBC
ASCENT, a phase 3 study, compared the efficacy and safety of SG compared with chemotherapy treatment of physicians’ choice (TPC) in 529 patients with refractory or relapsed mTNBC who had received ≥2 prior chemotherapies for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease.2
A post hoc subgroup analysis showed consistent efficacy outcomes with SG vs TPC, regardless of HER2 status. Among those in the HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 and HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ in situ hybridization (ISH) negative) subgroups, the following outcomes were observed in the SG and TPC groups, respectively.
- Median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.3 months vs 1.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28–0.5) in the HER2 IHC 0 group, and median PFS of 6.2 months vs 2.9 months, HR 0.45 (95% CI: 0.27–0.73) in the HER2-low group.3
- Median overall survival (OS) of 11.7 months vs 5.9 months, HR 0.5 (95% CI: 0.39–0.65) in the HER2 IHC 0 group, and median OS of 13.4 months vs 8.7 months, HR 0.52 (95% CI: 0.34–0.78) in the HER2-low group.3
- The incidence of Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 66% vs 52% in the HER2 IHC 0 group and 82% vs 69% in the HER2-low group.3
Results should be interpreted with caution due to the proportion of patients without available IHC expression data and lack of central assessment of HER2 expression in 22% of patients.4
Efficacy and Safety by HER2 Status in Patients With mTNBC
ASCENT Study
Study design and demographics
ASCENT, a phase 3 study, compared efficacy and safety of SG compared with TPC in 529 patients with refractory or relapsed mTNBC who had received ≥2 prior chemotherapies for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease (Figure 1).2
Figure 1. ASCENT Study Design2,5
A retrospective, post hoc subgroup analysis of the ITT population evaluated efficacy and safety of SG vs TPC according to HER2 status by analyzing local IHC and ISH results. Of the 529 patients in the ITT population, 78% were HER2 evaluable by IHC and were included in this analysis. Seventy-one percent of patients were HER2 IHC 0, and 29% of patients were HER2-low. Key demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the ITT and HER2-evaluable ITT populations (Table 1). Note that patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were excluded from the ASCENT study.3
Table 1. ASCENT: Demographics and Disease Characteristics in the ITT Population and According to HER2 Status3
Variable | ITT Population | HER2-Evaluable ITT Population | |||
SG (n=267) | TPC (n=262) | SG (n=211) | TPC (n=204) | ||
Age at study entry, median (range), y | 54 (27-82) | 53 (27-81) | 54 (27-82) | 53 (27-81) | |
Race, | White | 215 (81) | 203 (77) | 169 (80) | 163 (80) |
Black | 28 (10) | 34 (13) | 24 (11) | 25 (12) | |
Asian | 13 (5) | 9 (3) | 12 (6) | 5 (2) | |
Other | 11 (4) | 16 (6) | 6 (3) | 11 (5) | |
ECOG PS, n (%) | 0 | 121 (45) | 108 (41) | 91 (43) | 92 (45) |
1 | 146 (55) | 154 (59) | 120 (57) | 112 (55) | |
Previous chemotherapies, | 184 (69)/83 (31) | 181 (69)/81 (31) | 145 (69)/66 (31) | 139 (68)/65 (32) | |
Efficacy
SG showed consistent PFS and OS benefit vs TPC, regardless of HER2 status (Table 2). Objective response rates (ORRs) were greater among those who received SG than among those who received TPC in the HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low populations and were similar to those observed in the ITT population. Additional efficacy outcomes according to HER2 status are presented in Table 2. Results should be interpreted with caution due to the proportion of patients without available IHC expression data and the lack of central assessment of HER2 expression in 22% of patients.4
Table 2. ASCENT: Efficacy in the ITT Population and According to HER2 Status3
Variable | ITT | HER2 IHC0 | HER2-Low | ||||
SG (n=267) | TPC (n=262) | SG (n=149) | TPC (n=144) | SG (n=62) | TPC (n=60) | ||
PFS, events, n | 191 | 171 | 109 | 103 | 41 | 33 | |
Median (95% CI), mo | 4.8 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 2.9 | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.413 (0.33–0.517) | 0.38 (0.28–0.5) | 0.45 (0.27–0.73) | ||||
OS, events, n | 201 | 222 | 113 | 125 | 46 | 47 | |
Median (95% CI), mo | 11.8 | 6.9 | 11.7 | 5.9 | 13.4 | 8.7 | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.514 (0.422–0.625) | 0.5 (0.39–0.65) | 0.52 (0.34–0.78) | ||||
ORR, n (%) | 83 (31) | 11 (4) | 46 (31) | 5 (4) | 20 (32) | 5 (8) | |
OR (95% CI); P-value | 11 (5.7–21.4); | 12.4 (4.8–32.3); | 5.2 (1.8–15.1); | ||||
Best overall response, n (%) | CR | 10 (4) | 2 (1) | 3 (2) | 0 | 3 (5) | 1 (2) |
PR | 73 (27) | 9 (3) | 43 (29) | 5 (3) | 17 (27) | 4 (7) | |
Clinical benefit rate, | 108 (40) | 21 (8) | 54 (36) | 9 (6) | 30 (48) | 7 (12) | |
OR (95% CI); P-value | 8.1 (4.8–13.5); | 8.5 (4–18.1); | 7.1 (2.8–18); | ||||
Duration of response, median (95% CI), mob | 6.3 | 3.6 | 6.9 | 2.9 | 5.6 | 3.6 | |
Time to response, median (95% CI), mob | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | |
Abbreviations: CR=complete response; NE=not evaluable; OR=odds ratio; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.
aDefined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed best overall response of CR, PR, and SD with a duration of ≥6 mo .
bOnly patients achieving CR or PR were including in the duration of response and time to response analyses
Safety
Results of safety outcomes in the overall safety population and according to HER2 status are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. ASCENT: Safety in the Overall Safety Population and According to HER2 Status4
Variable | Overall Safety Population | HER2 IHC0 | HER2-Low | |||
SG | TPC | SG | TPC | SG | TPC | |
Grade ≥3 | 188 (73) | 145 (65) | 98 (66) | 75 (52) | 49 (82) | 36 (69) |
Led to dose reduction | 57 (22) | 59 (26) | 30 (21) | 27 (23) | 15 (25) | 19 (37) |
Led to dose delay | 162 (63) | 87 (39) | 88 (62) | 43 (36) | 39 (65) | 20 (39) |
Led to treatment discontinuation | 12 (5) | 12 (5) | 4 (3) | 6 (5) | 5 (8) | 2 (4) |
Led to death | 1 (<1)a | 3 (1) | 1 (<1)a | 0 | 0 | 3 (6) |
aConsidered unlikely to be related to SG treatment.
References
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries other than your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 5