Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Incidence and Management of Diarrhea
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy)
Incidence and Management of Diarrhea
Gilead continually assesses safety data from all sources for unidentified drug reactions and updates the product label information accordingly to reflect the safety profile of SG. Because case reports of potential adverse reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish causal relationship to drug exposure. For this reason, Gilead does not provide information from post-marketing spontaneous reports.
Information summarized in this document includes data for SG monotherapy (10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle) from Phase 2 and 3 clinical studies that constitute the largest pooled safety populations of SG.
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved Prescribing Information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA approved prescribing information.
The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings for neutropenia and diarrhea are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Summary
SG can cause severe diarrhea. Monitor patients with diarrhea and give fluid and electrolytes as needed. At the onset of diarrhea, evaluate for infectious causes and, if negative, promptly initiate loperamide. If severe diarrhea occurs, withhold SG until resolved to ≤ Grade 1 and reduce subsequent doses.
Management of adverse reactions may require temporary interruption, dose reduction, or treatment discontinuation of SG as described in Tables 1 and 2 of the Prescribing Information. Do not re-escalate the SG dose after a dose reduction for adverse reactions has been made.
A Pooled Safety Analysis of SG in Multiple Epithelial Tumors
A total of 1063 patients from four studies of multiple epithelial tumors (ASCENT,2 TROPiCS‑02,3 TROPHY-U-01,4,5 and IMMU-132-016) were included in this analysis.7 These studies included patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC), and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). The median treatment duration of SG was 4.1 (range: 0–63) mo.8
- Treatment-emergent any-grade diarrhea, Grade ≥3 diarrhea, and diarrhea that led to treatment discontinuation, was reported by 64%, 11% and 1% of patients treated with SG, respectively.7
- Grade ≥3 diarrhea was more common in patients with uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) *28/*28 genotype (15%) than in those with other genotypes (*1/*1, 8%; and *1/*28, 12%).7 UGT1A1 testing is not required as per the product label.1
- Median onset of any-grade and Grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at approximately 2 wk from treatment initiation and resolved in approximately 1 wk.7
- Antidiarrheal treatment was administered to 477 patients (70%); loperamide ± other antidiarrheals were used by 90% of these patients. Loperamide was advised for non-infectious diarrhea at onset.9-12 For unresolved diarrhea after 24 h, opium tincture12 and diphenoxylate/atropine10,12 were recommended. Subcutaneous octreotide was recommended for persistent diarrhea and premedication with atropine was recommended for patients who experienced a cholinergic response, including diarrhea, to SG.9-12 Additional supportive measures and dietary modifications were recommended.7,9,10,12
A Pooled Safety Analysis of SG in mBC
A total of 969 patients, with either with mTNBC or HR+/HER2- mBC, were included in an analysis of six clinical studies (ASCENT,2 TROPiCS-02,3 IMMU-132-01,6 EVER-132-001,13 EVER-132-002,14 and ASCENT-J0215).16 Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed by region, North America/Europe (NA/EU [n=688]) and Asia (n=281).
- Patients in NA/EU had higher rates of any-grade and Grade ≥3 diarrhea compared to Asia (absolute incidence not reported), these rates remained generally stable over time (through to approximately weeks 68 and 72 in NA/EU and Asia, respectively). Of the patients who received an antidiarrheal during SG treatment, a higher percentage in NA/EU received loperamide and atropine than patients in Asia; 89% and 20% vs 49% and 5%, respectively. A higher percentage of patients in Asia received other antidiarrheal treatment vs patients in NA/EU; 73% vs 23%, respectively.16
PRIMED Study in mTNBC and HR+/HER2- mBC
PRIMED, a phase 2 study in 50 patients with unresectable locally advanced mTNBC or HR+/HER2- mBC, is evaluating the impact of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony‑stimulating factor (G-CSF) as management of neutropenia and primary prophylactic loperamide as management of diarrhea.17
- At the primary safety analysis (median follow-up 4.3 mo) incidence of any-grade diarrhea after 2 cycles of SG was 34% (n=17); Grade ≥2 diarrhea was 16% (n=8) and Grade 3 diarrhea was 4% (n=2).17 At the extended safety analysis (median follow-up 9 mo) incidence of any-grade diarrhea was 44% (n=22); nine patients (18%) had Grade ≥2 diarrhea; there was no Grade 4 diarrhea. Two patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of Grade 2 enteritis and Grade 3 diarrhea.18
Real-World Safety of SG and Prophylactic Atropine Use19
In 3 Spanish centers, 17 female patients with unresectable locally advanced mTNBC and HR+/HER2- mBC were given atropine as a premedication to each SG infusion, according to the approved indications in Spain. Incidence of treatment-emergent any-grade, Grade 1, and Grade 2 diarrhea was 41% (n=7), 35% (n=6), and 6% (n=1), respectively. Three patients required an SG dose reduction. No discontinuations were due TEAEs.
Pooled SG Safety Analyses
Safety Analysis in Patients With Multiple Epithelial Tumors
A pooled safety analysis examined exposure to SG 10 mg/kg IV as monotherapy in 1063 patients from four studies of multiple epithelial tumors (ASCENT,2 TROPiCS-02,3 TROPHY-U-01,4,5 and IMMU-132-016).7 These studies included patients with mTNBC, HR+/HER2- mBC, and mUC (Figure 1). The median treatment duration of SG was 4.1 (range: 0–63) mo.8
Figure 1. Pooled Clinical Studies in Patients With Multiple Epithelial Tumors7
Abbreviations: CKD4/6i=cyclin-dependent 4/6 inhibitor; CPI=checkpoint inhibitor; PLT=platinum; TNBC=triple-negative breast cancer.
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Pooled Safety in Multiple Epithelial Tumors: Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics7
Key Demographics and Characteristics | All Patients (N=1063) | |
Age, median (range), y | 59 (27–90) | |
Sex, n (%) | Female | 840 (79) |
Race, n (%) | White/Black/Asian | 826 (78)/55 (5)/38 (4) |
Other or unknown | 144 (14) | |
ECOG PS, % | 0/1 | 36/64 |
Time since metastatic disease diagnosis, median (range), mo | 28.7 (-0.1 to 412.6) | |
Number of prior lines of systemic therapy, median (range), n | 5 (1–17) | |
Presence of visceral metastasis, n (%) | 882 (83) | |
UGT1A1 status, n (%) | *1/*1 | 416 (39) |
*1/*28 | 420 (40) | |
*28/*28 | 112 (11) | |
Other/unknown | 13 (1)/102 (10) | |
Abbreviation: ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.
Diarrhea Incidence, Onset, and Duration
Treatment-emergent any-grade diarrhea, Grade ≥3 diarrhea, and diarrhea that led to treatment discontinuation, was reported by 64%, 11% and 1% of patients treated with SG, respectively.7
Grade ≥3 diarrhea was more common in patients with UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype (15%) than in those with other genotypes (*1/*1, 8%; and *1/*28, 12%).7 UGT1A1 testing is not required as per the product label.1
Median any-grade and Grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred approximately 2 wk after treatment initiation and resolved in approximately 1 wk (Table 2).7
Table 2. Pooled Safety in Multiple Epithelial Tumors: Time to Onset and Resolution of Diarrhea (N=1063)7
| Time to Onset | Time to Resolution | ||
Any Grade | Grade ≥3 | Any Grade | Grade ≥3 | |
Diarrhea, median (range), wk | 1.9 (0.1–90) | 2.1 (0.1–78.6) | 1.1 (0.1–50) | 1 (0.1–7.9) |
Diarrhea Management
SG-associated toxicities were assessed and managed in accordance with standard clinical/institutional practices and accepted treatment guidelines.9-11,20
Antidiarrheal medication
At the onset of non-infectious diarrhea, prompt initiation of loperamide 4 mg was advised, followed by 2 mg per episode (up to a dose of 16 mg/d). According to the ASCENT and IMMU-132-01 protocols, loperamide was to be discontinued 12 h after diarrhea had resolved and normal diet resumed; this was not required in TROPiCS-02 or TROPHY-U-01.9-12
If diarrhea did not resolve after 24 h, the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-02 protocols recommended that diphenoxylate/atropine be considered.10,12 In addition, the TROPiCS-02 protocol also recommended opium tincture after 24 h.12 For persistent diarrhea, subcutaneous octreotide (100–150 mcg three times daily) could be considered.9-12
Additional supportive measures included fluid and electrolyte substitution and oral antibiotics,9-12 such as ciprofloxacin (for diarrhea that persisted >24 h, or in patients who exhibited an absolute neutrophil count <500/mm3 or fever with diarrhea). The ASCENT and IMMU-132-01 protocols specified a ciprofloxacin dose of 250 to 750 mg/12 h for 7 d.9,11 In the study protocols for TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-02, several dietary modifications were recommended, including a bland diet, small frequent meals, adequate intake of clear liquids to maintain hydration, and discontinuation of lactose-containing foods/drinks and alcohol.10,12
Anticholinergic medication
It was recommended that patients who experienced a cholinergic response to SG, including diarrhea, should receive premedications (eg, atropine) for future treatments.9-12
Incidence of patients receiving any antidiarrheal medication7
Of the 681 patients who experienced any-grade diarrhea, 477 (70%) received antidiarrheal medication (Table 3); loperamide ± other antidiarrheals were used by 90% of these patients.
Table 3. Pooled Safety in Multiple Epithelial Tumors: Treatment of Diarrhea7
n (%) | Patients Who Received Any Antidiarrheal (n=477) |
Any loperamide/any atropine | 428 (90)/97 (20) |
Loperamide alone/atropine alone | 277 (58)/9 (2) |
Other antidiarrheal alone | 22 (5) |
Multi-antidiarrheal regimena | 162 (34) |
aAntidiarrheals with the same start or overlapping treatment dates were considered an antidiarrheal regimen.
Pooled Safety Analysis in Patients With mBC
A pooled safety analysis of six clinical studies16 (ASCENT,2 TROPiCS-02,3 IMMU-132-01,6 EVER-132-001,13 EVER-132-002,14 and ASCENT-J0215) examined exposure to SG 10 mg/kg IV as monotherapy in 969 patients with mTNBC or HR+/HER2- mBC; TEAEs were analyzed by region, NA/EU and Asia. Except for race (Table 4), baseline characteristics, including age, sex and body mass index, were comparable between the NA/EU and Asia groups.
Table 4. Pooled Safety in mBC: Baseline Race by Region16
Race, n (%) | NA/EU (n=688) | Asia (n=281) |
White | 517 (75) | 0 |
Black | 41 (6) | 0 |
Asian | 26 (4) | 281 (100) |
Other/unknown | 104 (15) | 0 |
Diarrhea incidence and management16
Patients in the NA/EU region had higher rates of any-grade and Grade ≥3 diarrhea compared to patients in Asia (Figure 2), these rates remained generally stable over time (through to approximately weeks 68 and 72 in NA/EU and Asia, respectively). Diarrhea was identified as one of the most common reasons for discontinuation in the NA/EU region with an incidence of <1%.
Figure 2. Pooled Safety in mBC:
Incidence of Any-Grade (≥20%) and Grade ≥3 (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Diarrhea16
Of the patients who received an antidiarrheal during SG treatment, a higher percentage in the NA/EU region received loperamide and atropine than patients in Asia, while a higher percentage of patients in Asia received other antidiarrheal treatment vs patients in NA/EU (Table 5).
Table 5. Pooled Safety in mBC: Treatment of Diarrhea16
Patients, n (%) | Patients who received an antidiarrheal during SG treatment | Patients who experienced diarrhea and received an antidiarrheal during SG treatment | ||
NA/EU (n=343) | Asia (n=120) | NA/EU (n=298) | Asia (n=88) | |
Any loperamide | 304 (89) | 59 (49) | 271 (91) | 56 (64) |
Any atropine | 67 (20) | 6 (5) | 58 (19) | 5 (6) |
Other antidiarrheal | 80 (23) | 87 (73) | 76 (26) | 58 (66) |
PRIMED Study in mTNBC and HR+/HER2- mBC
Study Design and Patient Demographics17
PRIMED is an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating the impact of 1) primary prophylactic G-CSF as management of neutropenia and 2) primary prophylactic loperamide as management of diarrhea in 50 patients with unresectable locally advanced mTNBC (n=32) or HR+/HER2- mBC (n=18). Patients received primary prophylactic loperamide (2 mg twice-daily or 4 mg once-daily on Days 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 11). Patient baseline characteristics and prior treatments are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6. Baseline Characteristics and Prior Treatments17
Variables | mTNBC (n=32) | HR+/HER2- mBC (n=18) | Overall (N=50) | ||
Age, median (range), y | 51 (31–74) | 53.5 (37–72) | 52 (31–74) | ||
ECOG PS, n (%) | 0/1 | 18 (56.3)/14 (43.8) | 12 (66.7)/6 (33.3) | 30 (60)/20 (40) | |
Visceral disease, n (%) | 20 (62.5) | 15 (83.3) | 35 (70) | ||
Prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) | 19 (59.4) | 5 (27.8) | 24 (48) | ||
Prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease, n (%) | 0a | 8 (25) | 2 (11.1) | 10 (20) | |
1 | 18 (56.3) | 11 (61.1) | 29 (58) | ||
2 | 6 (18.8) | 5 (27.8) | 11 (22) | ||
aSystemic treatment in the curative setting was considered as a line of therapy if development of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease occurred within 12 mo of chemotherapy or immunotherapy completion.
Safety
Primary Safety Analysis17
The primary safety analysis had a median follow-up time of 4.3 (range: 0.2-8.6) mo. At data cut-off, October 18, 2023, 31 patients (62%) remained on treatment. Disease progression was the primary reason for treatment discontinuation in 16 patients (32%). Results were reported for 50 patients after the first 2 cycles of SG with the incidence of any Grade diarrhea (34%) and Grade ≥2 diarrhea was reported in 8 patients (16%) (P=0.084) (Table 7).
Extended Safety Analysis18
The extended safety analysis had a median follow-up of 9 (range; 0.2-13.5) mo. At data cut-off, May 5, 2024, the incidence of any Grade diarrhea was 44.0% (Table 7). A total of 9 patients (18.0%) had Grade ≥2 diarrhea (no Grade 4). The overall rate of AEs associated with dose reductions and treatment interruptions was 22% and 50%, respectively. Four patients discontinued due to AEs, two of which were SG-related (Grade 2 enteritis and Grade 3 diarrhea; Table 8). Other TEAEs can be found in Table 9.
Table 7. Diarrhea During First 2 Cycles and Until Data Cut-Off17,18
Diarrhea | ||||
n (%) | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Any Grade |
After 2 cycles | 9 (18) | 6 (12) | 2 (4) | 17 (34) |
Data cut-off | 13 (26) | 7 (14) | 2 (4) | 22 (44) |
Table 8. Dose Reductions, Treatment Interruptions, and Discontinuations
due to AEs17,18
Dose Reductions | Treatment Interruptions | Permanent Discontinuations | |
After 2 cycles | 7(14) | 15(30) | 0(0) |
Data cut-off | 11(22) | 25(50) | 4(8) |
Table 9. Any Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Occurring in Patients Until Data Cut-Off18
Any Grade | Grade ≥ 3 | |
All TEAEs | 50 (100) | 26 (52) |
Gastrointestinal Disorders | 47 (94) | 6 (12) |
Constipation | 28 (56) | 0 (0) |
Diarrhea | 22 (44) | 2 (4) |
Nausea | 27 (54) | 0 (0) |
Intestinal Obstruction | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Abdominal Upper Pain | 9 (18) | 2 (4) |
Neutropenic Colitis | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders | 32 (64) | 13 (26) |
Neutropenia | 21 (42) | 12 (24) |
Anemia | 24 (48) | 2 (4) |
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions | 38 (76) | 8 (16) |
Pain | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Asthenia | 35 (70) | 7 (14) |
Infections and Infestations | 23 (46) | 1 (2) |
Acute Pyelonephritis | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | 30 (60) | 5 (10) |
Alopecia | 20 (40) | 4 (8) |
Urticaria | 2 (4) | 1 (2) |
Investigations | 14 (28) | 2 (4) |
Increased Gamma-Glutamyltransferase | 6 (12) | 2 (4) |
Hepatobiliary Disorders | 5 (10) | 1 (2) |
Hepatic Failure | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
Real-World Safety of SG and Prophylactic Atropine Use19
In 3 Spanish centers, 17 female patients with unresectable locally advanced mTNBC (n=13) and HR+/HER2- mBC (n=4) received atropine (0.5 mg subcutaneous) as a premedication to each SG infusion, according to the approved indications in Spain. Patient baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 10.
Table 10. Baseline Characteristics19
Key Variables | SG + Atropine (n=17) | |
Age, median (range), y | 50 (29-72) | |
ECOG PS, n (%) | 0/1/2 | 2 (11.8)/9 (52.9)/6 (35.3) |
Neg/Pos | 15 (88.2)/2 (11.8) | |
PDL1 Expression, n (%) | Neg/Pos | 3 (17.6)/14 (82.1) |
Of the 17 patients that received prophylactic atropine, 7 patients developed any Grade diarrhea, 6 patients Grade 1 diarrhea, and 1 patient Grade 2 diarrhea. Constipation was not reported as a common TEAE. Three patients required an SG dose reduction and there were no discontinuations due to TEAEs.
References
11. Immunomedics Inc. IMMU-132-01. A phase I/II study of IMMU-132 (hRS7-SN38 antibody drug conjugate) in patients with epithelial cancer [Protocol]. 2020. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/52/NCT01631552/Prot_000.pdf.
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Trodelvy US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/oncology/trodelvy/trodelvy_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Trodelvy Medical Information at:
☎ 1‐888-983-4668 or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries besides your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.
TRODELVY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 10