Veklury® (remdesivir)
SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.

Veklury® (remdesivir)

SIMPLE Study in Patients With Severe COVID-19

This document is in response to your request for information on the SIMPLE study, which evaluated the use of Veklury® (remdesivir [RDV]) in hospitalized participants with severe COVID-19.

Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA approved prescribing information.

The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings are available at: www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/covid-19/veklury/veklury_pi.

Summary

SIMPLE Study: RDV Use in Severe COVID-19

A phase 3, randomized, open-label study compared the outcomes of nonmechanically ventilated participants with severe COVID19 who received either 5 or 10 days of RDV treatment and SoC.1

  • The 10- and 5-day RDV groups experienced similar rates of recovery (54% [106/197] and 64% [129/200], respectively) and times to recovery (11 and 10 days).1,2
  • The mortality rate was numerically lower in the 5day RDV group than in the 10-day RDV group (8%  [12/200] and 11% [21/197], respectively).1
  • The number of AEs and SAEs were similar in the 5-day and 10-day RDV groups. The most common AEs were nausea, worsening respiratory failure, elevated ALT level, and constipation.1

SIMPLE Study: RDV Use in Severe COVID-19

Study Design

A phase 3, randomized, two-part (Parts A and B), open-label study compared the outcomes of hospitalized participants with severe COVID-19 who received 5 or 10 days of RDV and SoC. The primary outcome was the distribution of clinical status scores on a 7point ordinal scale on Day 14. The secondary objective was the proportion of patients who had a treatment-emergent AE or a treatment-emergent clinical laboratory abnormality.1,2

Part A enrolled 397 participants who were not mechanically ventilated between March 6 and March 26, 2020, and those who met all eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive RDV 200 mg IV loading dose on Day 1, followed by RDV 100 mg/day IV for either 4 days or 9 days with SoC therapy (Figure 1). Both treatment arms continued to receive SoC therapy. The protocol did not require participants whose clinical status improved enough to be eligible for hospital discharge to complete the full course of assigned RDV treatment.1

n=3971:1Day151014RDV 200 mg IV loading dose on Day 1RDV 100 mg IV daily ×9 days + SoCn=197n=200RDV 200 mg IV loading dose on Day 1 RDV 100 mg IV daily ×4 days + SoCPrimary EndpointbClinical status at Day 14 on 7-point ordinal scaleSecondary EndpointProportion of participants with AEsn=5600RDV 200 mg IV loading dose on Day 1RDV 100 mg IV daily ×9 daysc+ SoCData reported descriptivelyPart APart BKey Inclusion Criteria:Age ≥12 yearsaHospitalizedConfirmed COVID-19 by PCR ≤4 days before randomizationSpO2≤94% on room air or requiring supplemental O2Radiographic evidence of pulmonary infiltratesKey Exclusion Criteria:Part A: mechanical ventilation or ECMO at screeningPart B: mechanical ventilation ≥5 daysCrCl<50 mL/minALT or AST levels >5 ×ULNMultiorganfailurePregnant or lactating women
Figure 1
. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19: Study Design1,2

Abbreviations: PCR=polymerase chain reaction; SpO2=peripheral oxygen saturation; ULN=upper limit of normal.
aAdults ≥18 years or adolescents between 12 and 18 years weighing ≥40 kg were included.

bThe primary efficacy population was composed of participants from Part A. Clinical status was assessed with a 7-point ordinal scale that included the following categories: 1) death; 2) hospitalized and required IMV or ECMO; 3) hospitalized and required NIV or high-flow O2 devices; 4) hospitalized and required low-flow supplemental O2; 5) hospitalized and did not require supplemental O2 but required ongoing medical care (COVID-19-related or otherwise); 6) hospitalized but did not require supplemental O2 or ongoing medical care; 7) not hospitalized.

cIn Part B, treatment could be reduced to a total of 5 days following analysis of the data from Part A.

Note: Of the 402 participants who underwent randomization, 397 began RDV treatment.

Baseline Demographics and Participant Disposition1

Baseline demographics were balanced between the groups; however, significantly more participants in the 10-day RDV group were in the two highest disease severity groups, and therefore had a worse clinical status at baseline, compared with the 5-day RDV group (P=0.02).

Table 1. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19:
Select Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics1

Key Demographics and Characteristics

10-Day RDV
(n=197)

5-Day RDV
(n=200)

Age, median (IQR), years

62 (50–71)

61 (50–69)

Male, n (%)

133 (68)

120 (60)

Race,a White/Black/Asian/other, n (%)

134 (70)/23 (12)/
25 (13)/10 (5)

142 (71)/21 (10)/
20 (10)/17 (8)

Most common coexisting conditions,
n (%)

Hypertension

98 (50)

100 (50)

Hyperlipidemia

49 (25)

40 (20)

Diabetes

43 (22)

47 (24)

Clinical status on the 7point ordinal scale,b
n (%)

2 - Required IMV or ECMO

9 (5)

4 (2)

3 - Required NIV or high-flow O2

60 (30)

49 (24)

4 - Required low-flow supplemental O2

107 (54)

113 (56)

5 - Did not require supplemental O2 but required medical care

21 (11)

34 (17)

Duration of symptoms before RDV initiation, median (IQR), days

9 (6–12)

8 (5–11)

aPatient-reported race data were available for 192 participants who received 10 days of RDV and for all 200 participants who received 5 days of RDV.

bP=0.02 for 5-day vs 10-day group.

All participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment were included in the analyses of efficacy and safety. In the 5-day group, 86% of participants (172/200) completed the course of RDV (median [IQR] duration: 5 [5–5] days); 8% (16/200) were discharged from the hospital; and 4% (9/200) discontinued RDV due to AEs. In the 10-day group, 44% of participants (86/197) completed the course of RDV (median [IQR] duration: 9 [5–‍10] days); 35% (68/197) were discharged from the hospital; 11% (22/197) discontinued RDV due to AEs; and 6% (12/197) died.

Efficacy1

The proportion of participants who had clinical improvement of ≥2 points on the 7-point ordinal scale at Day 14 was similar between the 10-day and 5-day RDV groups (54% [107/197] and 64% [129/200], respectively; Figure 2 and Table 2). After adjusting for differences in baseline disease severity, the rate of clinical improvement at Day 14 was similar between participants who received 5 days of RDV treatment and those who received 10 days of RDV treatment (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51–1.12).

The mortality rate was numerically lower in the 5-day group than in the 10-day group (8% [16/200] vs 11% [21/197]). Non-significant differences between groups were observed for the rates of recovery and modified recovery.


Figure 2
. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19:
Observed Rates of Clinical Improvement,a Clinical Recovery,b and Mortality1

aDefined as a ≥2-point improvement in ordinal scale.
bDefined as improvement from a baseline score of 2 to 5 to a score of 6 or 7.

Table 2. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19: Efficacy Outcomes at Day 141,2

Efficacy Outcomes

10-Day RDV
(n=197)

5-Day RDV
(n=200)

Baseline-Adjusted Differencea (95% CI)

Clinical improvement,b n (%)

107 (54)

129 (64)

-6.5% (-15.7 to 2.8)

Time to clinical improvement,c days

11

10

0.79 (0.61–1.01)

Clinical recoveryd at Day 14, n (%)

106 (54)

129 (64)

-6.3 (-15.4 to 2.8)

Time to recovery,c median (IQR), days

11 (7 to NE)

10 (6 to 18)

0.81 (0.64–1.04)

Modified recoverye at Day 14, n (%)

116 (59)

140 (70)

-6.7 (-15.3 to 1.9)

Time to modified recovery,c days

10

9

0.82 (0.64–1.04)

Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), days

8 (5–10)

7 (6–10)

Not evaluated

Abbreviation: NE=not estimable.

aBaseline-adjusted difference values are rate differences, except for the time to clinical improvement, time to recovery, and time to modified recovery.

bDefined as a ≥2-point improvement in ordinal scale.

cThe median day of 50% cumulative incidence.
dDefined as improvement from a baseline score of 2 to 5 to a score of 6 or 7.

eDefined as improvement from a baseline score of 2 to 4 to a score of 5 to 7 or improvement from a baseline score of 5 to a score of 6 or 7.

Numerically, more patients were discharged from the hospital in the 5-day group than in the 10-day group (60% [120/200] vs 52% [103/197], respectively). Discharge rates were higher in the overall population among patients with <10 days of symptoms before the first dose of RDV than among those with ≥10 days of symptoms before the first dose (62% vs 49%), respectively.

Safety1

The incidence of AEs was similar between groups (see Table 3). AEs of Grade 3 or higher were observed in 43% of participants in the 10-day group and 30% in the 5-day group.1

Table 3. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19: Safety Outcomes1

Safety Outcomes, n (%)

10-Day RDV
(n=197)

5-Day RDV
(n=200)

Any AE

145 (74)

141 (70)

Most common AEs
(≥5% of participants)

Acute respiratory failure

21 (11)

12 (6)

Nausea

17 (9)

20 (10)

ALT level increased

15 (8)

11 (6)

Acute kidney injury

15 (8)

4 (2)

Respiratory failure

14 (7)

7 (4)

Constipation

13 (7)

13 (6)

AST level increased

13 (7)

10 (5)

Hypokalemia

12 (6)

10 (5)

Hypotension

12 (6)

9 (4)

Insomnia

11 (6)

10 (5)

Any SAE

68 (35)

42 (21)

Most common SAEs
(≥5% of participants)

Acute respiratory failure

18 (9)

10 (5)

Respiratory failure

10 (5)

5 (2)

AEs that led to RDV discontinuation

20 (10)

9 (4)

Most of the laboratory abnormalities were transient, and there were no significant differences in the median changes in laboratory abnormalities between treatment groups. Aminotransferase elevations led to treatment discontinuation in 3.6% of participants in the 10day RDV group and in 2.5% of those in the 5-day RDV group. More participants in the 10-day RDV group than in the 5-day RDV group experienced Grade 4 CrCl reductions (12% vs 3%). Among the participants with Grade 4 CrCl decreases, 71% required IMV, NIPPV, or high-flow O2 supplementation at baseline.

Table 4. SIMPLE Study in Severe COVID-19: Laboratory Abnormalities1

Key Laboratory Abnormalities,a n/N (%)

10-Day RDV
(n=197)

5-Day RDV
(n=200)

Any Grade ≥3 laboratory abnormality

64/191 (34)

53/195 (27)

CrCl decreased

Grade 3

13/188 (7)

13/193 (7)

Grade 4

23/198 (12)

5/193 (3)

ALT level increased

Grade 3

11/191 (6)

8/194 (4)

Grade 4

5/191 (3)

4/194 (2)

AST level increased

Grade 3

7/190 (4)

11/194 (6)

Grade 4

4/190 (2)

3/194 (2)

Total bilirubin level increased

Grade 3

3/190 (2)

1/193 (1)

Grade 4

1/190 (1)

0

aGraded laboratory abnormalities were defined with the grading scheme in the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Event, Version 2.1, dated July 2017.

References

1. Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe Covid-19. N Eng J Med. 2020:1-11.

2. Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe Covid-19 [Protocol]. N Eng J Med. 2020.

Abbreviations

Page 1 of 6


AE=adverse event
ECMO=extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
IMV=invasive mechanical ventilation
NIPPV=noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
NIV=noninvasive ventilation
O2=oxygen


RDV=remdesivir
SAE=serious adverse event
SoC=standard of care

 


 


Product Label

For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Biktarvy US Prescribing Information available at: www.gilead.com/~/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/biktarvy/biktarvy_pi.

Follow Up

For any additional questions, please contact Gilead Medical Information at:

1866MEDIGSI (18666334474) or   www.askgileadmedical.com

Adverse Event Reporting

Please report all adverse events to:

Gilead Global Patient Safety 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
https://www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event

FDA MedWatch Program by 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or   www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch

Data Privacy

The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.

It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries besides your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.

VEKLURY, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Page 1 of 6