Yeztugo® (lenacapavir)
Alternative Sites of Administration
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Yeztugo® (lenacapavir)
Alternative Sites of Administration
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/yeztugo/yeztugo_pi;
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/descovy/descovy_pi;
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/truvada/truvada_pi.
Summary
LEN injection is only for SUBQ administration into the abdomen by a healthcare provider. The thigh can be used as an alternative injection site if preferred. Do NOT administer intradermally due to risk of serious ISRs.
Two 1.5 mL injections are required for a complete dose. If administering in the abdomen, ensure injections are ≥2 inches away from the navel. The second injection should be administered ≥4 inches from the first injection site.
Available Data on Alternative Sites of LEN Administration
An analysis of data from the RBP and OLE phases of PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 studies assessed the safety and tolerability of LEN SUBQ injections in the thigh, upper arm, and upper buttock compared with the abdomen.2
- LEN administration in non‑abdominal sites (ie, thigh, upper arm, and upper buttocks) was associated with fewer ISRs than administration in the abdomen.
- ISR nodules and indurations generally resolved more quickly when LEN was administered in non-abdominal sites than in the abdomen, although there was longer follow-up for abdominal injection administered during the RBP.
- LEN administration in non‑abdominal sites was generally well tolerated with no serious ISRs or ISRs that led to discontinuation.
A phase 1, open-label, multicohort study evaluating the PK and safety of LEN SUBQ administered in different sites demonstrated that exposure to LEN administered into the thigh, upper arm, abdomen, and gluteal regions were generally similar. Observed PK differences among the different sites were not considered clinically significant.3,4
Product Labeling1
Dosage and Administration
Preparation and administration of SUBQ injection
LEN injection is only for SUBQ administration into the abdomen by a healthcare provider. The thigh can be used as an alternative injection site if preferred. Do NOT administer intradermally due to risk of serious ISRs.
Use aseptic technique. Visually inspect the solution in the vials and prepared syringe for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration. LEN injection is a yellow solution. Do not use LEN injection if the solution is discolored or if it contains particulate matter. Once the solution is withdrawn from the vials, the SUBQ injections should be administered as soon as possible.
Figure 1 identifies the components for use in the administration steps for the withdrawal needle injection kit. The 18-gauge needle is for withdrawal only in this kit.
The injection kit components are for single use only. Two 1.5 mL injections are required for a complete dose.
Figure 1. LEN Withdrawal Needle Injection Kit Components1
The administration steps are provided in Figure 2. Select and clean the injection sites. If administering in the abdomen, ensure injections are ≥2 inches away from the navel. Administer the second injection ≥4 inches apart from the first injection site.
Figure 2. LEN Injection Steps for Withdrawal Needle Injection Kit1
Inform individuals that a SUBQ drug depot forms following LEN injection. Advise that, in some individuals, this may lead to a nodule at the injection site. Improper administration (intradermal injection) of LEN has been associated with serious ISRs, including necrosis and ulcer. Ensure LEN is only administered SUBQ.
Available Data on Alternative Sites of LEN Administration
PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2
Study designs
PURPOSE 1 (NCT04994509) is an ongoing, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active‑controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of twice-yearly SUBQ LEN and once-daily oral FTC/TAF or FTC/TDF for HIV-1 PrEP in cisgender women and adolescent girls aged 16 to 25 years across South Africa and Uganda.5
PURPOSE 2 (NCT04925752) is an ongoing, phase 3, double-blind, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of twice-yearly SUBQ LEN and once‑daily oral FTC/TDF for HIV-1 PrEP in cisgender gay, bisexual, and other men; TGW; TGM; and GNB individuals aged ≥16 years in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, South Africa, Thailand, and the US who have condomless receptive anal sex with partners assigned male at birth.6
In both studies, participants randomly assigned to LEN in the RBP could continue on LEN in the OLE phase; participants randomly assigned to FTC/TAF or FTC/TDF who continued into the OLE switched to LEN. Participants received LEN SUBQ injections in the abdomen during the RBP; pregnant participants in PURPOSE 1 could choose to receive LEN administration in the thigh. Participants who continued in the OLE phase could choose to receive LEN SUBQ injections in the abdomen, thigh, upper arm, or upper buttocks.2
Safety and tolerability of LEN SUBQ injection locations2
An analysis was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of LEN SUBQ injections in non‑abdominal sites (ie, thigh, upper arm, and upper buttocks) compared with abdominal sites. All participants who received LEN SUBQ in the RBP or OLE phase were included (Table 1). Outcomes included investigator-reported ISRs and AEs that were associated with LEN SUBQ administration across all injection sites.
Table 1. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 Analysis: Baseline Demographics2
PURPOSE 1 | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks (n=398) |
Female sex at birth, % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Body weight, median (IQR), kg | 65.2 (55.9–79.5) | 63.5 (55.8–75) | 69.8 (59–84) | 66.8 (56.6–81.6) |
BMI, median (IQR), kg/m2 | 26 (22.3–31.5) | 25.6 (22.6–30) | 27.8 (23.6–33.3) | 26.8 (23–32) |
Pregnant or postpartum at time of injection, n (%) | 384 (8.3) | 225 (51.4) | 126 (9.3) | 25 (6.3) |
PURPOSE 2 | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks (n=72) |
Male sex at birth, n (%) | 2953 (98.1) | 46 (93.9) | 390 (99) | 72 (100) |
Body weight, median (IQR), kg | 75.7 (65–89) | 77.9 (65.6–88.4) | 81.7 (70.5–97.1) | 76.5 (68.9–88.2) |
BMI, median (IQR), kg/m2 | 25.3 (22.1–29.1) | 24.5 (22.7–28.9) | 26.9 (23.6–31) | 25.4 (22.7–28.8) |
A smaller percentage of participants across both studies had ISRs in the thigh, upper arm, or upper buttocks than in the abdomen (Figure 3). Note that the sample sizes of thigh, upper arm, and upper buttocks injections were smaller relative to that of abdomen injections in both studies.
Figure 3. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 Analysis: Proportion of Participants in the RBP and OLE Phase With LEN-Related ISRs by Injection Site2
A smaller proportion of participants had AEs of injection site nodules and pain with LEN administration in non-abdominal sites than in the abdomen; however, there were fewer participants who received injections in the thigh, upper arm, and upper buttocks than abdominal injections in both studies (Figure 4).
Figure 4. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 Analysis: Proportion of LEN Injections in the RBP and OLE Phase Resulting in ISRs by Injection Site2
Note: Each LEN 927 mg SUBQ dose was administered as 2 × 1.5 mL injections. For nodules and indurations, bilateral events from the same injection visit were counted as separate AEs; all other ISRs were not counted separately, and all events with the same AE onset date were counted as one event.
Injection site nodules and indurations generally resolved more quickly when LEN was administered in non-abdominal sites than in the abdomen, although there was longer follow‑up for abdominal injections administered during the RBP (Table 2). LEN administration in the thigh, upper arm, or upper buttocks was generally well tolerated with no serious ISRs or ISRs that led to discontinuation (Table 3).
Table 2. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 Analysis: Duration and Resolution of LEN‑Related Nodules and Indurations2
PURPOSE 1 | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks | |
All LEN | Switched to LEN OLE (n=2482) | All LEN | All LEN | All LEN | |
Total injections, n | 28,891 | 11,082 | 1113 | 3298 | 895 |
Nodules, n (%) | 11,899 (41.2) | 4723 (42.6) | 108 (9.7) | 268 (8.1) | 74 (8.3) |
Resolved,a n (%) | 7326 (61.6) | 2275 (48.2) | 57 (52.8) | 80 (29.9) | 19 (25.7) |
Time to resolution,b median (IQR), days | 260 (151–364) | 182 (91–275) | 90 (80–174) | 91 (72–142) | 90 (86–97) |
Indurations, n (%) | 276 (1) | 79 (0.7) | 22 (2) | 30 (0.9) | 2 (0.2) |
Resolved,a n (%) | 213 (77.2) | 47 (59.5) | 13 (59.1) | 25 (83.3) | 1 (50) |
Time to resolution,b median (IQR), days | 87 (15–262) | 53 (17–233) | 15 (11–49) | 29 (10–55) | 95 (NR) |
PURPOSE 2 | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks | |
All LEN (n=3010) | Switched to LEN OLE (n=827) | All LEN (n=49) | All LEN (n=394) | All LEN (n=72) | |
Total injections, n | 19,706 | 3113 | 109 | 846 | 145 |
Nodules, n (%) | 10,430 (52.9) | 1839 (59.1) | 35 (32.1) | 213 (25.2) | 44 (30.3) |
Resolved,a n (%) | 6201 (59.5) | 597 (32.5) | 10 (28.6) | 98 (46) | 11 (25) |
Time to resolution,b median (IQR), days | 270 (176–367) | 183 (106–273) | 116 (82–178) | 85 (32–96) | 182 (168–184) |
Indurations, n (%) | 2025 (10.3) | 398 (12.8) | 1 (0.9) | 15 (1.8) | 0 |
Resolved,a n (%) | 1641 (81) | 288 (72.4) | 1 (100) | 12 (80) | N/A |
Time to resolution,b median (IQR), days | 85 (7–191) | 11 (6–115) | 93 | 22 (3–95) | N/A |
Abbreviation: NR=not reported.
aDenominator was the number of nodules or indurations.
bDuration was calculated by subtracting the onset date from the stop date and adding 1 day.
Table 3. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 Analysis: ISRs2
PURPOSE 1, Participants (%) | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks | |
All LEN | Switched to LEN OLE (n=2482) | All LEN | All LEN | All LEN | |
Any ISR | 3188 (69) | 1575 (63.5) | 95 (21.7) | 295 (21.9) | 68 (17.1) |
Grade 3 or 4 ISR | 8 (0.2) | 3 (0.1) | 3 (0.7) | 0 | 1 (0.3) |
Any serious ISR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISR that led to LEN discontinuation | 6 (0.1) | 2 (<0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISR that led to study discontinuation | 1 (<0.1) | 1 (<0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PURPOSE 2, Participants (%) | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Upper Buttocks | |
All LEN (n=3010) | Switched to LEN OLE (n=827) | All LEN (n=49) | All LEN (n=394) | All LEN (n=72) | |
Any ISR | 2628 (87.3) | 723 (87.4) | 22 (44.9) | 196 (49.7) | 30 (41.7) |
Grade 3 or 4 ISR | 18 (0.6) | 3 (0.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Any serious ISR | 1 (<0.1) | 1 (0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISR that led to LEN discontinuation | 27 (0.9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISR that led to study discontinuation | 3 (<0.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 1 PK Study: Administration in Different Sites3
Study design and demographics
A phase 1, open-label, parallel-design, single-dose, multicohort study evaluated the PK and safety of LEN administered SUBQ in different sites.3,4 Healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 55 years who had a BMI of 19 to 30 kg/m2 were enrolled in one of four cohorts (n=10 per cohort). Each cohort of healthy volunteers received a single 927 mg dose of LEN SUBQ administered as two 1.5 mL injections either bilaterally in the thigh, upper arm, or gluteal region or in two different abdominal quadrants, which is the approved administration site and served as a reference. PK samples from plasma were collected post dose at Hours 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, and 216, followed by weekly or biweekly assessments between Days 15 and 210 and monthly assessments through to Day 270.3 Safety evaluations included injection site examinations on Days 1 to 10 and at each study visit through Day 270 to evaluate the occurrence of ISRs. Baseline demographics were generally similar among cohorts (Table 4).3
Table 4. Phase 1 PK Study: Baseline Demographics3
Key Demographics | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Gluteal Region (n=10) |
Male, % | 50 | 50 | 60 | 40 |
Age, mean ± SD, years | 44±11.5 | 44±9.5 | 43±6.7 | 40±9.7 |
Race, White/Black or African American, % | 70/30 | 70/30 | 80/20 | 100/0 |
Weight, mean ± SD, kg | 74.7±8.7 | 77.8±11.5 | 80.3±13.4 | 74.4±11.6 |
BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 27±2.4 | 27±1.6 | 27.2±2.9 | 26.9±2.2 |
PK results3
Exposures to LEN after SUBQ administration into the thigh, upper arm, and gluteal regions were generally similar or slightly higher than those observed after administration into the abdomen; observed PK differences were not considered clinically significant (Table 5). GM Cmax, AUC6 mo, and AUClast values were 8% to 15% lower after SUBQ administration into the thigh than those observed for the abdomen (reference comparator) cohort; these PK parameters were 5% to 33% higher in the upper-arm cohort and 18% to 26% higher in the gluteal-region cohort than in the abdomen cohort. The GM C6 mo in each cohort was greater than the IQ4 (target efficacy concentration) of 15.5 ng/mL.
Table 5. Phase 1 PK Study: PK Parameters by Administration Site3
Parameters | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Gluteal Region (n=9a) |
Cmax, GM (%CV), ng/mL | 56.7 (40.7) | 52.1 (67.4) | 75.6 (57.2) | 71.2 (42.7) |
Tmax, median (Q1, Q3), h | 2660 | 2490 | 1990 | 2160 |
T1/2, median (Q1, Q3), h | 1440 | 1430 | 1260 | 1560 |
C6 mo, GM (%CV), ng/mL | 28.6 (60.6) | 22.6 (69.9) | 18.7 (59.9) | 25.2 (68) |
AUC6 mo, GM (%CV), ng∙h/mL | 144,000 (38.2) | 122,000 (73.9)b | 172,000 (45.5) | 181,000 (36.9) |
AUClast, GM (%CV), ng∙h/mL | 187,000 (33.3) | 164,000 (57.6)b | 196,000 (43.9) | 220,000 (35.9) |
AUC∞, GM (%CV), ng∙h/mL | 223,000 (34.7) | 267,000 (26.2)b | 208,000 (43.8) | 247,000 (35.3) |
Abbreviations: %CV=geometric % coefficient of variation; AUC∞=area under the concentration-time curve to infinity; Q=quartile; T1/2=half-life; Tmax=time to Cmax.
aThree healthy volunteers (abdomen, n=2; gluteal region, n=1) were lost to follow-up or withdrew prematurely.
bAUC∞ and T1/2, n=6; AUClast and AUC6 mo, n=9.
Safety results4
No serious AEs or AEs that resulted in study discontinuation occurred. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 38/40 participants (95%), and all non-ISR treatment-related AEs were Grade 1. Most participants (38/40; 95%) experienced ISRs, and the most common ISRs were pain (90%), induration (73%), erythema (70%), nodules (15%), and swelling (15%; Table 6). All ISRs were Grade ≤2 except for 1 event of erythema in the upper-arm cohort.
Table 6. Phase 1 PK Study: Most Common ISRs by Administration Site4
ISR, % | Abdomen | Thigh | Upper Arm | Gluteal Region (n=10) | |||||
Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | |
Pain | 100 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 |
Induration | 50 | 30 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 80 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Erythema | 50 | 10 | 30 | 60 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 40 |
Nodules | 20 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Swelling | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
References
1. Enclosed, Gilead Sciences Inc. YEZTUGO® (lenacapavir) tablets, for oral use. YEZTUGO® (lenacapavir) injection, for subcutaneous use. U.S. Prescribing Information. Foster City, CA.
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 9
AE=adverse event
AUC6 mo=area under the concentration-time curve at 6 months
AUClast=area under the concentration-time curve from dosing to last measurable concentration
C6 mo=concentration at 6 months
Cmax=maximum concentration
FTC=emtricitabine
GM=geometric mean
GNB=gender nonbinary
IQ4=inhibitory quotient-4
IRR=incident rate ratio
ISR=injection site reaction
LEN=lenacapavir
OLE=open-label extension
P1/2=PURPOSE 1/2
PK=pharmacokinetic(s)
PrEP=pre-exposure prophylaxis
RBP=randomized blinded phase
SUBQ=subcutaneous(ly)
TAF=tenofovir alafenamide
TDF=tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
TGM=transgender men
TGW=transgender women
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning, please refer to the Yeztugo US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/yeztugo/yeztugo_pi;
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/descovy/descovy_pi;
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/hiv/truvada/truvada_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Gilead Medical Information at:
☎1‐866‐MEDI‐GSI (1‐866‐633‐4474) or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries besides your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact gilead.privacy@gilead.com.
YEZTUGO, DESCOVY, DESCOVY for PrEP, TRUVADA, TRUVADA for PrEP, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2026 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 9